2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent grasslands in Europe: Land use change and intensification decrease their multifunctionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the V4 countries different, in some cases, opposite trends and processes influence the area of grasslands. Meanwhile at the EU level, the Corine data showed growth of pastures and natural grasslands until 2018, several studies draw the attention on the constant decrease of permanent grassland (Schils, 2022). Our analysis based on Corine data revealed the shrinkage of natural grassland in the V4 countries, while the area of pastures increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the V4 countries different, in some cases, opposite trends and processes influence the area of grasslands. Meanwhile at the EU level, the Corine data showed growth of pastures and natural grasslands until 2018, several studies draw the attention on the constant decrease of permanent grassland (Schils, 2022). Our analysis based on Corine data revealed the shrinkage of natural grassland in the V4 countries, while the area of pastures increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…CES are generally not as well understood as most other ecosystem services (Chan et al 2012 ; Schils et al 2022 ), which is even more true for the various threats that imperil the continued supply of CES in permanent grasslands. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of such threats that have been described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural afforestation was perceived as a threat to landscape aesthetics and recreation due to hindered views and reduced accessibility (see also Nassauer 1995 ). However, experts and foreign tourists considered forested areas closer to their natural state and an ‘ideal landscape’ with limited to no human impact (see also Schils et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations