2000
DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peritoneal drainage as definitive treatment for neonates with isolated intestinal perforation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
111
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The surgical experience with these diseases suggest that SIP and NEC with perforation may not respond to peritoneal drainage in the same manner. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] There is currently a multicenter randomized trial being planned to examine which surgical intervention to use with NEC and SIP respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The surgical experience with these diseases suggest that SIP and NEC with perforation may not respond to peritoneal drainage in the same manner. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] There is currently a multicenter randomized trial being planned to examine which surgical intervention to use with NEC and SIP respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD provides definitive treatment for most premature infants with isolated intestinal perforation. Seventy-three percent of the neonates with perforation caused by NEC require subsequent laparotomy [46]. The results of this study are subjected to bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When it was initially created, the Fig. 2 Comparison between the ROC curves of SNAPPE-II and MDAS at the moment of the assessment by a surgeon natural history of NEC and intestinal perforation [29] were taken on account and Tepas established three different pathways which would lead to bowel perforation in very low birth weight neonates: sudden perforation with no previous metabolic derangement (which would correspond to neonatal intestinal perforation), bad response to medical treatment and metabolic derangement followed by signs of free intraperitoneal air, and bad response to medical treatment plus metabolic derangement without signs of free intraperitoneal air (the last two would correspond to NEC). The MDAS was presented as a good tool in the management of these patients, treating them with PD when there were not metabolic alterations, and with laparotomy when there were signs of metabolic impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%