1984
DOI: 10.1002/gj.3350190402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peritidal carbonate facies models: A review

Abstract: Existing facies models for peritidal carbonates are limited in number and do not reflect the wide spe.ctrum of possible types The major depositional processes in peritidal carbonate environments are reviewed in order to stress the complex nature of the systems. The tidal channel model is critically discussed and it is suggested that channel deposits may be of minor importance in typical shoaling-up sequences. The possible causes of multiple asymmetrical sequences are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In macrotidal areas, tide dominates over other processes and most mesotidal and microtidal areas are wave and storm dominated, but tide domination may even occur in a protected microtidal coast where wave action is limited (Dalrymple 1992 ) . In contrast to their siliciclastic counterparts, most modern peritidal carbonate environments are microtidal (Wright 1984 ;Pratt et al 1992 ) .…”
Section: Tidal Processesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In macrotidal areas, tide dominates over other processes and most mesotidal and microtidal areas are wave and storm dominated, but tide domination may even occur in a protected microtidal coast where wave action is limited (Dalrymple 1992 ) . In contrast to their siliciclastic counterparts, most modern peritidal carbonate environments are microtidal (Wright 1984 ;Pratt et al 1992 ) .…”
Section: Tidal Processesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most of the cycles only show the progradational components typical of shallowwater, high-frequency cycles in peritidal environments (James 1983;Wright 1984) and consequently represent asymmetrical cycles. Three basic types of cycles are present in the Santa Lucia Formation: (1) intertidal/supratidal cycles, (2) shallow subtidal/intertidal, restrictive cycles and (3) subtidal cycles (see Fig.…”
Section: Small-scale Cycles (Or Units)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3). These successions with a lack of transgressive sediments but a distinctive progradational trend are commonly described as asymmetric cycles (Wright 1984). Cycles with an additional, basal retrogradational succession are referred to as symmetric or complete cycles.…”
Section: Cycles and Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the dolomite over the Buntsandstein facies indicates it was the Wrst sediment of the transgressive stage and corresponds to very shallow upper shoreface or foreshore deposits (James 1979). Originally, this dolomite was probably like the oolitic sands of Joulters Cays (the Bahamas) or coast of Kuwait, which are interpreted as shallow shoreface and beach sediments related to tidal channels (e.g., Picha 1978;Wright 1984;Boardman and Carney 1991).…”
Section: Facies 1: Brown Dolosparitementioning
confidence: 98%