2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 69 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 We found that the BMD recorded at the first postoperative examination did not predict relative change in BMD at 5 years. This is in accordance with the findings by Soininvaara et al 5 and Regnér et al, 17 who did not observe any association between initial BMD in the proximal tibia and subsequent BMD changes. However, Muller et al 18 reported that high mineral content at operation correlated significantly with periprosthetic bone loss 5 years after total hip replacement in young patients with cementless custom-made femoral implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 We found that the BMD recorded at the first postoperative examination did not predict relative change in BMD at 5 years. This is in accordance with the findings by Soininvaara et al 5 and Regnér et al, 17 who did not observe any association between initial BMD in the proximal tibia and subsequent BMD changes. However, Muller et al 18 reported that high mineral content at operation correlated significantly with periprosthetic bone loss 5 years after total hip replacement in young patients with cementless custom-made femoral implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Stress shielding is considered the major cause for this bone loss. Several studies have shown that the most pronounced reduction occurs during the first year after implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nding was demonstrated by detailed BMD analysis by high-solution DXA in selected ROIs, and revealed 21 bone loss in the distal femur and 25 in the tibia, compared with normal annual Only a few studies have reported the ef cacy of measuring BMD around the knee after TKA following the development of high-solution DXA 12 . Soininvaara et al [5][6][7] measured periprosthetic tibial BMD, but these data did not cover both the tibial and femoral sides, and involved only short-term follow-up and a cemented TKA. Petersen et al 13 looked at cementless TKA, but the BMD measurement was by dual photon absorptiometry rather than DXA, and only the tibial side was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses two X-ray beams of different energy levels to scan the region of interest and measure attenuation as the beam passes through the bone 4 . Soininvaara et al [5][6][7] qualitatively assessed bone around the knee components after TKA using DXA. However, these studies evaluated only the femoral, or tibial, side, and an analysis of the stress shielding and remodeling of bone around the knee following TKA is needed.…”
Section: Originalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation