2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral vision, perceptual asymmetries and visuospatial attention in young, young-old and oldest-old adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative point of view is that under appropriate control, processing speed accounts for most age-related differences in executive deficits (Verhaeghen and Cerella, 2002 ). For example, a study of three groups of participants, with mean ages of 22, 70, and 85 years, respectively, showed common perceptual and orienting attention patterns, and differences were observed for processing speed only (Muiños et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative point of view is that under appropriate control, processing speed accounts for most age-related differences in executive deficits (Verhaeghen and Cerella, 2002 ). For example, a study of three groups of participants, with mean ages of 22, 70, and 85 years, respectively, showed common perceptual and orienting attention patterns, and differences were observed for processing speed only (Muiños et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the allocation of covert attention to the periphery (a cognitive process) is likely to be decreased in older adults, it seems that sensory phenomena, such as crowding in the peripheral visual field, remain unchanged in aging (Astle et al, 2014). Similarly, Muiños et al (2016) found that the cost of detecting eccentric targets compared to foveal targets was not different for older and younger adults. The difference between (most of) these studies appears to be whether a central task and a peripheral task are competing with one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Adding a secondary central task to visual search affects peripheral performance of older adults to a much greater extent than the younger adults' performance (Ball et al, 1988;Sekuler et al, 2000), which could be due to said decrease in peripheral attention but also to impaired divided attention abilities in older adults. On the other hand, other studies have shown no decline in peripheral visual function (Astle, Blighe, Webb, & McGraw, 2014;Hommel et al, 2004;Muiños, Palmero, & Ballesteros, 2016). While the allocation of covert attention to the periphery (a cognitive process) is likely to be decreased in older adults, it seems that sensory phenomena, such as crowding in the peripheral visual field, remain unchanged in aging (Astle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The onset time of IOR is about 300 ms following cue onset (for a meta-analysis, see Samuel and Kat, 2003), however, it also varies with task difficulty (e.g., Lupiáñez et al, 1997; Lupiáñez et al, 2001; see Klein, 2000, for a discussion) and reflects the flexibility of executive control. For instance, the onset time of IOR is much later in older adults, whose executive functions are declining (e.g., Langley et al, 2011; Muiños et al, 2016; Li et al, 2018). The delayed onset of IOR is likely the result of slow (or failed) disengagement of attention from the cue (Lupiáñez et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%