2021
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral taste detection in honey bees: What do taste receptors respond to?

Abstract: Understanding the neural principles governing taste perception in species that bear economic importance or serve as research models for other sensory modalities constitutes a strategic goal. Such is the case of the honey bee (Apis mellifera), which is environmentally and socioeconomically important, given its crucial role as pollinator agent in agricultural landscapes and which has served as a traditional model for visual and olfactory neurosciences and for research on communication, navigation, and learning a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
(413 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bees were trained during 10 consecutive trials using a differential conditioning procedure ( Figure 1E ) in which one of the rectangles (i.e., one of the two colors, green or blue) was rewarded with 1.5 M sucrose solution (the appetitive conditioned stimulus or CS +) while the other rectangle displaying the alternative color (the aversive conditioned stimulus or CS−) was associated with 3 M NaCl solution. The latter was used to increase the penalty of incorrect choices ( Ayestaran et al, 2010 ; de Brito Sanchez et al, 2015 ; Aguiar et al, 2018 ; Bestea et al, 2021 ). To avoid directional biases, the rewarded and the punished color rectangles were swapped between the left and the right side of the virtual arena in a pseudo random manner along trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bees were trained during 10 consecutive trials using a differential conditioning procedure ( Figure 1E ) in which one of the rectangles (i.e., one of the two colors, green or blue) was rewarded with 1.5 M sucrose solution (the appetitive conditioned stimulus or CS +) while the other rectangle displaying the alternative color (the aversive conditioned stimulus or CS−) was associated with 3 M NaCl solution. The latter was used to increase the penalty of incorrect choices ( Ayestaran et al, 2010 ; de Brito Sanchez et al, 2015 ; Aguiar et al, 2018 ; Bestea et al, 2021 ). To avoid directional biases, the rewarded and the punished color rectangles were swapped between the left and the right side of the virtual arena in a pseudo random manner along trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one of the two colors, green or blue) was rewarded with 1.5 M sucrose solution (the appetitive conditioned stimulus or CS+) while the other cuboid displaying the alternative color (the aversive conditioned stimulus or CS−) was associated with either 60 mM quinine (Experiment 2) 34 or 3 M NaCl solution 35 , 36 (Experiment 3). The latter was used to increase the penalty for incorrect choices 37 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hoverfly Eristalis arbustorum can distinguish sucrose with or without 150ppb clothianidin at a distance, potentially due to their spectral difference (Clem et al, 2020). Unlike hoverflies, bees seem to have a non-gustatory preference for neonicotinoid-contaminated sucrose solutions, although the reason behind this preference and the mechanism is not clear (Bestea et al, 2021;de Brito Sanchez et al, 2005;Kessler et al, 2015). Nicotinoids may be spectrally more attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%