1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1993.tb01512.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral T‐Cell Reactivity to Bacterial Superantigens in vivo: The Response/Anergy Paradox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model that may explain our results is that in addition to activating large numbers T cells in vivo and stimulating the release of large quantities of cytokines (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), injected SEA may also promote activated neutrophils and macrophages to colocalize with the responding T cells in an inflammatory site in the spleens of the SAg-treated animals. We postulate that once the conditions for suppression have been established in vivo, subsequent antigenic restimulation in vitro promotes further IFN-␥ production, stimulating small numbers of Gr-1 ϩ cells in the enriched T cell cultures to produce a combination of RNI and ROI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A model that may explain our results is that in addition to activating large numbers T cells in vivo and stimulating the release of large quantities of cytokines (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), injected SEA may also promote activated neutrophils and macrophages to colocalize with the responding T cells in an inflammatory site in the spleens of the SAg-treated animals. We postulate that once the conditions for suppression have been established in vivo, subsequent antigenic restimulation in vitro promotes further IFN-␥ production, stimulating small numbers of Gr-1 ϩ cells in the enriched T cell cultures to produce a combination of RNI and ROI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the response peaks about 3 days after the SAg is injected and then declines abruptly, leaving diminished populations of SAg-reactive CD4 T cells in the periphery of the SAgtreated animals. In some studies, the residual SAg-reactive T cells were hyporesponsive to restimulation (6). Secondary T cell responses to injected SAg are also very transient and even more rapidly aborted than the primary response (7).…”
Section: S Uperantigens (Sag)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the case of a large V␤ family, such as V␤8 receptors, which account for ϳ20% of the murine T cell repertoire, activation with an appropriate superantigen may affect an enormous sector of the total repertoire, far greater than the proportion involved in a given peptidespecific response. Superantigenic stimulation results in a systemic release of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, TNF-␣, TNF␤, and IFN-␥ (8 -11) with rapid expansion of T cells followed by deletion or anergy (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of mice with strong superantigens such as SEB has been shown to induce AICD of Vb8 þ T cell clones, and thus cause non-responsiveness of the animal's T cells to the superantigen [17]. The extent of non-responsiveness induced by SEB treatment was investigated in the mice with chronic GVHD of 3 weeks duration.…”
Section: Effect Of Treatment With Csa On Antigen-specific Th Cell Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%