2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00201.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral Subcutaneous Neurostimulation in the Management of Neuropathic Pain: Five Case Reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1970s, PNS was seldom performed because the high morbidity and poor long-term outcomes related to poor patient selection and technical limitations for inadequate devices. However, growing evidences suggested that PNS is effective, in particular NP syndromes characterized by peripheral nerve lesions or irritation with pain or positive phenomena with a localized peripheral nerve distribution [9, 21, 27, 31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the 1970s, PNS was seldom performed because the high morbidity and poor long-term outcomes related to poor patient selection and technical limitations for inadequate devices. However, growing evidences suggested that PNS is effective, in particular NP syndromes characterized by peripheral nerve lesions or irritation with pain or positive phenomena with a localized peripheral nerve distribution [9, 21, 27, 31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been used by a small group of neurosurgeons for the treatment of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain since 1967 [30]. Although in literature, PNS was demonstrated to be quite successful in the short and medium term [4, 6, 9, 21, 27, 29], PNS has never become a standard technique for treatment of NP syndromes. This may be due to technical difficulties with paddle-type electrodes inserted around the peripheral nerve and to the risk of infections or electrode dislocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Increasing interest about PNS and PNFS in recent years has led to a wider use of neurostimulation to control headache and pain in the extremities and in the occipital region. 1,7,9,11,14,17,21,22,25,28 Manufacturing developments have made it possible to reduce the thickness of the electrodes, which can also be used in facial regions without any esthetic impairment. A clear differential diagnosis between TNP and PIFP versus classic trigeminal neuralgia is mandatory to assess the proper treatment plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…geniş A-beta liflerinin daha küçük A-delta ve C fiberlerine afferent çıkışlarda dönüştüğünü tanım-lamışlardır. [25] Başka bir makalede de, [26] sinirden başlayıp ciltte sonlanan membran depolarizasyon ve antienflamatuvar temelindeki mekanizmayı öne sürmektedir, fakat o da A-beta sinir lifi aktivasyonunu tanımlamıştır. Bu mekanizmalar ancak daha çok yapılacak olan çalışmalarla açıklanabilecektir.…”
Section: Pain a Riunclassified
“…Spinal kord stimülasyonunun aksine SUBQ stimülasyonu etkilenen ağrı bölgesindeki kutanöz afferent ya da bu sinirlerin dermatomal dağılımlarının olduğu Alana yerleştirerek sağlanır. [6][7][8][9][10] Yapılan çalışmalar, kronik ağrı tedavisinde spinal kord stimülasyonu uygulamasının güvenli ve efektif olduğunu göstermiştir. [11,12] Bu yazıda lumbar disk hernisi nedeniyle operasyon geçiren ve sonrasında postlaminektomi sendromu gelişen ve SKS uygulanmasına rağmen sağ kalça ve bel bölgesinde ağrı şi-kayeti devam eden hastaya sağ kluneal sinir dağılım bölgesine oktad elektrod'un subkutan (SUBQ) olarak yerleştirildiği hastadan bahsedilmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified