2000
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.20251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral corticotropin-releasing factor and stress-stimulated colonic motor activity involve type 1 receptor in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

20
248
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
20
248
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A genetic variation in intestinal stress response has also been documented in other rat strains, e.g., Fischer and Lewis rats (18). In this study, we sought to determine whether neonatal stress, which causes phenotypic changes in behavior and systemic parameters, also affects the sensitivity to stress-induced functional changes of the colonic mucosa in genetically stressresistant Sprague-Dawley rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A genetic variation in intestinal stress response has also been documented in other rat strains, e.g., Fischer and Lewis rats (18). In this study, we sought to determine whether neonatal stress, which causes phenotypic changes in behavior and systemic parameters, also affects the sensitivity to stress-induced functional changes of the colonic mucosa in genetically stressresistant Sprague-Dawley rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The involvement of neurons was suggested by modulation of the CRH response by atropine, hexamethonim, and bretylium (5,28). Peripheral effects of CRH have been shown to regulate colonic motor activity (18), and expression of CRH and CRH receptors is also found in the colonic mucosa of rodents (19) and humans (13,23). Coutinho et al (7) recently reported that maternal separation induced visceral hyperalgesia and increased colonic motility in adult rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress can have differential effects on gastrointestinal motor responses -delaying gastric emptying while simultaneously accelerating large bowel transit, and there are numerous reports, both clinical and experimental, implicating stress as a significant modulator of gastrointestinal motor function [22]. Since defecation responses are a reliable measure of autonomic nervous system modulation of colonic motility, fecal pellet output was recorded to see if the stress paradigm utilized in the present study affected gastrointestinal motor function in high-and/or low-anxiety rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Of the two CRF receptor subtypes, CRF-R1 stimulates colonic motility and defecation, whereas CRF-R2 inhibits gastric emptying and gastric contraction at times of stress. 15 Anatomical, physiological, pharmacological and biochemical studies have provided unambiguous evidence that the CRF system (CRF, urocortins, CRF-R1 and CRF-R2) is the key player of gastrointestinal motility disturbance during times of stress. 7,16 Hypothesis: in utero meconium passage is a fetal neurovisceral motor response to stress We hypothesize that in utero meconium passage is a neurovisceral motor response to fetal stress and that the CRF system plays a critical role in the stimulation of cholinergically mediated fetal colonic propulsive motor functions that trigger meconium passage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing studies in our laboratory also support the expression of CRF-R1 in smooth muscle and enteric neuronal circuitry in term rat fetal gastrointestinal tract, 26 lending strong anatomical support for our hypothesis that intrauterine stress may impact gut motility through CRF-R1 in a manner analogous to stress-induced stimulation of colonic motility and defecation in adult rats. 15 Lessons learned from sheep model in support of stress-induced in utero meconium passage Sheep are used in our laboratory as a large animal model for understanding the molecular mechanism of in utero meconium passage. [27][28][29] The larger size of the gut and longer gestational age permit in vivo studies exploring gestation-and hormone-dependent changes in gastrointestinal motility, and in vitro organ bath studies examining smooth muscle contractility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%