2013
DOI: 10.4199/c00086ed1v01y201307isp040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral Arterial Disease: Pathophysiology and Therapeutics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines state that an ABPI ratio of < 0.9 indicates the occurrence of PAD and recommends its use for diagnosis at a primary care level. 19 Moreover, increasing stenosis leads to a decrease in ABPI, 3,20 and can therefore be used as a means of grading disease. ABPI is limited in that it cannot localise pathology and may be unreliable in the event of vascular calcification, where falsely elevated ABPI readings (> 1.4) have been reported frequently in patients with medial calcinosis of the tibial arteries, 3,7,8,21 reducing overall sensitivity in these subgroups.…”
Section: No Pad Padmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines state that an ABPI ratio of < 0.9 indicates the occurrence of PAD and recommends its use for diagnosis at a primary care level. 19 Moreover, increasing stenosis leads to a decrease in ABPI, 3,20 and can therefore be used as a means of grading disease. ABPI is limited in that it cannot localise pathology and may be unreliable in the event of vascular calcification, where falsely elevated ABPI readings (> 1.4) have been reported frequently in patients with medial calcinosis of the tibial arteries, 3,7,8,21 reducing overall sensitivity in these subgroups.…”
Section: No Pad Padmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Moreover, increasing stenosis leads to a decrease in ABPI, 3,20 and can therefore be used as a means of grading disease. ABPI is limited in that it cannot localise pathology and may be unreliable in the event of vascular calcification, where falsely elevated ABPI readings (> 1.4) have been reported frequently in patients with medial calcinosis of the tibial arteries, 3,7,8,21 reducing overall sensitivity in these subgroups. 8 As such, the authors feel that excluding the small number of such readings in the present study was justifiable (n ¼ 11); however, it is acknowledged that the diagnostic test accuracy statistics, including Kappa, would have been negatively affected had such readings been retained in the analysis.…”
Section: No Pad Padmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Penilaian tingkat PAD lebih akurat dengan menghitung Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) dibandingkan pemeriksaan darah (Johnston & Cronenwett, 2014). Selain itu, ABI merupakan pemeriksaan yang paling umum digunakan dan diterima dengan baik, sederhana dan murah serta hanya membutuhkan waktu sekitar 10 menit untuk mengetahui adanya PAD (Kevil, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified