2011
DOI: 10.1201/9781439812174-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripersonal Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the somatosensory system, motor-related signals at different levels of the sensorimotor system can affect virtually all levels of the tactile processing pathway ( Zagha et al, 2013 ; Manita et al, 2015 ; Canedo, 1997 ; Fanselow and Nicolelis, 1999 ; Lee et al, 2008 ; Seki and Fetz, 2012 ; Adams et al, 2013 ) and incoming tactile information can be predictively filtered during action, making it possible for the sensorimotor system to attenuate irrelevant inputs and highlight task-critical information ( Chapman, 1994 ; Bays et al, 2005 ; Blakemore et al, 1999 ). Since our task can be considered a tool-use task, it is also interesting to note that tool use is associated with dynamically remapping of space represented by central multisensory, predominantly tactile neurons ( Maravita and Iriki, 2004 ; Brozzoli et al, 2012 ). However, we are not aware of any studies that have directly compared the neural processing of exactly the same macrogeometric tactile information depending on whether used in fine dexterity tasks or in perceptual judgements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the somatosensory system, motor-related signals at different levels of the sensorimotor system can affect virtually all levels of the tactile processing pathway ( Zagha et al, 2013 ; Manita et al, 2015 ; Canedo, 1997 ; Fanselow and Nicolelis, 1999 ; Lee et al, 2008 ; Seki and Fetz, 2012 ; Adams et al, 2013 ) and incoming tactile information can be predictively filtered during action, making it possible for the sensorimotor system to attenuate irrelevant inputs and highlight task-critical information ( Chapman, 1994 ; Bays et al, 2005 ; Blakemore et al, 1999 ). Since our task can be considered a tool-use task, it is also interesting to note that tool use is associated with dynamically remapping of space represented by central multisensory, predominantly tactile neurons ( Maravita and Iriki, 2004 ; Brozzoli et al, 2012 ). However, we are not aware of any studies that have directly compared the neural processing of exactly the same macrogeometric tactile information depending on whether used in fine dexterity tasks or in perceptual judgements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of neurosciences, neurophysiological studies in monkeys as well as brain imaging and lesion studies in humans have evidenced this dichotomy, and showed that PPS is coded in the brain through multisensory integration mechanisms [1][2][3][4]. This dedicated multisensory representation is thought to have a role in apprehending events occurring in the space near the body, which require the implementation of particularly appropriate and precise behaviors: be it for dealing with imminent threat [4] or for attaining an object of interest [5]. Furthermore, PPS displays flexible boundaries that are sensitive to motor action factors [6,7] as well as to affective components [8,9], so that multisensory integration related to the body can be adaptively boosted according to the context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the region of space within which objects can be grasped and manipulated) is known as the Peripersonal space (PPS). Electrophysiological experiments on monkeys and neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies on humans (for a review see 1 ) showed that there are complex neuronal networks in premotor, parietal and subcortical brain regions underlying PPS 2 3 4 5 6 7 . A fast, automatic integration of various different sensory and motor signals within the PPS is guaranteed by multisensory bimodal neurons (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%