2010
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Determined by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Ophthalmologically Normal Eyes

Abstract: To evaluate the peripapillary distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in normal eyes using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and to study potentially related factors. Methods: In 7 institutes in Japan, RNFLT in 7 concentric peripapillary circles with diameters ranging from 2.2 to 4.0 mm were measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in 251 ophthalmologically normal subjects. Multiple regression analysis for the association of RNFLT with sex, age, axial length, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
69
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(97 reference statements)
15
69
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Refractive error and age at examination are some of the well-known confounding factors in the interpretation of peripapillary RNFL thickness. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] In addition, we performed correlation analysis between various baseline factors and peripapillary RNFL thicknesses in multiple sectors separately. As there was a difference in the pattern of RNFL distribution according to different sectors, it would be more accurate to analyze RNFL thickness in each sector separately.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refractive error and age at examination are some of the well-known confounding factors in the interpretation of peripapillary RNFL thickness. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] In addition, we performed correlation analysis between various baseline factors and peripapillary RNFL thicknesses in multiple sectors separately. As there was a difference in the pattern of RNFL distribution according to different sectors, it would be more accurate to analyze RNFL thickness in each sector separately.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 These findings were confirmed by histological studies demonstrating a significant association between age and RNFL thickness in normal subjects. 23,24 Particularly, large baseline RNFL thickness was found to be associated with a faster rate of RNFL thickness loss. 20 Mean rate of change of average RNFL thickness in our control subjects was À0.67 mm/year (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29 to 1.04).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The young age of the SSOH patients reduces the possibility that SSOH and NTG co-exist to that of unlikely because glaucoma is relatively uncommon among the young. The RNFL is reported to become thinner with aging [18,19]. Parikh et al reported that the change in average RNFL thickness as measured by OCT due to age is -0.16 lm/year in normal eyes [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%