Abstract:Over the past several decades, the proportion of children in non-White racial and ethnic groups in the United States has increased significantly. For example, the Latinx population is currently the country's second largest racial/ethnic group and is expected to increase from 62 million persons to an estimated 111 million by 2060.The terms "Hispanic" and "Latinx" are often used interchangeably, but Hispanic refers to those who speak Spanish or are descended from a Spanish-speaking lineage, whereas Latinx refers… Show more
“…Of note, this review will present research that goes beyond examining racial disparities (i.e., differences in perioperative outcomes across racial or ethnic groups) and incorporates the measurement of SDOH variables and analyzes the effect of SDOH on perioperative outcomes. For an update on racial disparities in pediatric anesthesia, please see recent reviews by Willer et al [2 ] and Tan et al [1] for a comprehensive overview of racial disparities in pediatric anesthesia and perioperative pain management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature documenting pediatric perioperative care disparities and treatment inequities [1,2 ▪ ], which underscores the need to identify and address factors driving disparities in pediatric perioperative care. To date, evidence of pediatric perioperative disparities has primarily come from research comparing perioperative outcomes across racial and ethnic groups, with data indicating that children of racial and ethnic minoritized groups are more likely to experience inequitable care and poorer outcomes, including more postoperative complications, longer lengths of stay, and inadequate perioperative pain management [1,2 ▪ ]. To identify treatment practices that promote more equitable care and outcomes, it is imperative to appreciate and identify multidimensional, systemic, and social mechanisms driving these disparities.…”
Purpose of review
There is increasing evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric perioperative care, which indicates a need to identify factors driving disparities. Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a fundamental role in pediatric health and are recognized as key underlying mechanisms of healthcare inequities. This article summarizes recent research exploring the influence of SDOH on pediatric perioperative outcomes.
Recent findings
Despite the scarcity of research exploring SDOH and pediatric perioperative outcomes, recent work demonstrates an association between SDOH and multiple outcomes across the perioperative care continuum. Measures of social disadvantage were associated with preoperative symptom severity, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of postoperative complications and mortality. In some studies, these adverse effects of social disadvantage persisted even when controlling for medical comorbidities and clinical severity.
Summary
The existing literature offers compelling evidence of the impact of SDOH on perioperative outcomes in children and reveals a critical area in pediatric anesthesia that necessitates further exploration and action. To improve outcomes and address care inequities, future efforts should prioritize the integration of SDOH assessment into pediatric perioperative research and practice.
“…Of note, this review will present research that goes beyond examining racial disparities (i.e., differences in perioperative outcomes across racial or ethnic groups) and incorporates the measurement of SDOH variables and analyzes the effect of SDOH on perioperative outcomes. For an update on racial disparities in pediatric anesthesia, please see recent reviews by Willer et al [2 ] and Tan et al [1] for a comprehensive overview of racial disparities in pediatric anesthesia and perioperative pain management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature documenting pediatric perioperative care disparities and treatment inequities [1,2 ▪ ], which underscores the need to identify and address factors driving disparities in pediatric perioperative care. To date, evidence of pediatric perioperative disparities has primarily come from research comparing perioperative outcomes across racial and ethnic groups, with data indicating that children of racial and ethnic minoritized groups are more likely to experience inequitable care and poorer outcomes, including more postoperative complications, longer lengths of stay, and inadequate perioperative pain management [1,2 ▪ ]. To identify treatment practices that promote more equitable care and outcomes, it is imperative to appreciate and identify multidimensional, systemic, and social mechanisms driving these disparities.…”
Purpose of review
There is increasing evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric perioperative care, which indicates a need to identify factors driving disparities. Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a fundamental role in pediatric health and are recognized as key underlying mechanisms of healthcare inequities. This article summarizes recent research exploring the influence of SDOH on pediatric perioperative outcomes.
Recent findings
Despite the scarcity of research exploring SDOH and pediatric perioperative outcomes, recent work demonstrates an association between SDOH and multiple outcomes across the perioperative care continuum. Measures of social disadvantage were associated with preoperative symptom severity, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of postoperative complications and mortality. In some studies, these adverse effects of social disadvantage persisted even when controlling for medical comorbidities and clinical severity.
Summary
The existing literature offers compelling evidence of the impact of SDOH on perioperative outcomes in children and reveals a critical area in pediatric anesthesia that necessitates further exploration and action. To improve outcomes and address care inequities, future efforts should prioritize the integration of SDOH assessment into pediatric perioperative research and practice.
“…Synthesizing the existing barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients is the premise of developing effective strategies. (37)(38)(39). Therefore, this systematic review will synthesize barriers and facilitators in the literature under the guidance of implementation science and evaluate the importance of different factors (37).…”
Background The incidence of procedural pain is high in pediatric patients. Poorly treated pain will contribute to a variety of short-term and long-term adverse effects in children. There are many evidence-based effective pain treatments for reducing procedural pain, such as topical anesthetics, skin-to-skin care, sweet solutions, and breastfeeding; however, in clinical settings, the rate of using these effective procedural pain treatments is still very low. This systematic review aims to synthesize the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of effective procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients.
Methods Primary studies will be included if they report any barriers or facilitators to procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients. There are no restrictions on the year and language of publication of studies. Both published studies and grey literature will be identified. We will search published studies through Medline(OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. Grey literature will be searched through Google Scholar, OpenGrey, e-theses online service, ProQuest, WorldCat, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, and public health organization websites. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess all studies' quality. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will be used as a theoretical framework to code the barriers and facilitators in each study. A meta-synthesis method will be used to synthesize the findings across studies.
Discussion In this review, the CFIR framework will be used to systematically collect and analyze barriers and facilitators to procedural pain management in pediatric patients. The mixed studies review is necessary to include the heterogeneity of different studies to give us a more complete picture of the context in which the intervention was implemented. The next step could be to develop interventions that target these factors to better improve clinical outcomes for patients.
Systematic review registration CRD42022322319
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.