Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Trachelectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Approaches

Yoon, Aera; Choi, Chel Hun; Choi, Jung-Joo; Kim, T.-H.; Lee, Y.-Y.; Kim, T.-J.; Lee, J.-W.; Kim, B.-G.; Bae, Dong Ho

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.627

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of those abstracts, 130 full texts were scrutinised, and 51 failed to meet the inclusion criteria, leaving 79 studies for inclusion in our analysis 25,38–115 . Additionally, the literature search yielded several systematic reviews, which were manually assessed, and we identified a further 25 studies not captured by the initial literature search 26,116–139 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in outcome reporting in studies of fertility‐sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review

Yong

Cooper

Yorke

et al. 2022

BJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cervical cancer affects 3197 women in the UK, and 604 000 women worldwide annually, with peak incidence seen in women between 30 and 34 years of age. For many, fertility-sparing surgery is an appealing option where possible. However, absence of large-scale data, along with a notable variation in reported outcomes in relevant studies, may undermine future efforts for consistent evidence synthesis. Objectives: To systematically review the reported outcomes measured in studies that include women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer and identify whether variation exists. Search strategy: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL from inception to February 2019. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, cohort and observational studies, and case studies of more than ten participants from January 1990 to date. Data collection and analysis: Study characteristics and all reported treatment outcomes. Main results: A total of 104 studies with a sum of 9535 participants were identified. Most studies reported on oncological outcomes (97/104), followed by fertility and pregnancy (86/104), postoperative complications (74/104), intra-operative complications (72/104) and quality of life (5/104). There was huge variation and heterogeneity in reported outcomes, with only 12% being good quality and 87% being of poor quality. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. An agreed Core Outcome Set is necessary for future studies to effectively harmonise reported outcomes that are measurable and relevant to patients, clinicians and researchers. This systematic review sets the groundwork for the development of a Core Outcome Set for fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in outcome reporting in studies of fertility‐sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review

Yong

Cooper

Yorke

et al. 2022

BJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yoon et al compared laparoscopic radical vaginal trachelectomy to radical vaginal trachelectomy. The procedures were comparable in terms of tumor size, recurrence, and operative outcomes .…”

Section: Radical Trachelectomy To Preserve Fertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends

Medlin

Kushner

Barroilhet

2015

Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The management of early stage cervical cancer often includes surgery in the form of radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, or radical parametrectomy. Surgical techniques have evolved to include minimal invasive approaches, and more recently, to include robotic assisted techniques. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management of early cervical cancer and specifically explores robotic assisted radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, radical parametrectomy, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

show abstract

Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Trachelectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Approaches

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Variation in outcome reporting in studies of fertility‐sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review

Variation in outcome reporting in studies of fertility‐sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review

Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About