2015
DOI: 10.1177/0194599815600409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Common Otolaryngologic Surgical Procedures

Abstract: When the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy is being decided, 3 critical factors must be considered systematically: the patient's inherent thromboembolic risk, the risk and potential consequences of bleeding related to the procedure, and the timing of interruption of thromboembolic therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(233 reference statements)
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in high‐risk thromboembolic patients, the interruption of antithrombotic treatment should be minimized. If a high‐risk patient is undergoing a procedure with low bleeding risk and low risk of major hemorrhage‐associated complications, such as awake injection laryngoplasty, the patient can safely continue antithrombotic therapy . Our study supports this: all 10 patients on warfarin due to atrial fibrillation or aortic valve replacement were continued on this therapy without any hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in high‐risk thromboembolic patients, the interruption of antithrombotic treatment should be minimized. If a high‐risk patient is undergoing a procedure with low bleeding risk and low risk of major hemorrhage‐associated complications, such as awake injection laryngoplasty, the patient can safely continue antithrombotic therapy . Our study supports this: all 10 patients on warfarin due to atrial fibrillation or aortic valve replacement were continued on this therapy without any hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…“Low risk” patients are defined as those having less than or equal to 5% annual risk. “Moderate‐to‐high‐risk” patients have an annual risk greater than 5% . Risk stratification is influenced by underlying pathology and associated disease‐related risk assessments, as defined by CHADS 2 classification (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age greater than 75 years, diabetes, previous stroke or ischemic attack) or the updated CHADS 2 ‐VASc, which includes vascular disease, age between 65 and 74 years, and female gender as predictive factors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, those with mechanical prosthetic valve are of consideration because they are not candidates for NOACs26. Concerned patients' medical conditions that are prone to develop thrombo-embolism are listed up in Table 329.…”
Section: Bleeding Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 CHADS 2 score means congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, and prior stroke/transient ischemic attack. 2 Updated version of CHADS 2 score. 3 High-risk features include atrial fibrillation, prior thromboembolism, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, mitral or tricuspid valve placement, ≥2 prosthetic valves, and older aortic ball or tilting disc valves.Revised from the article of Hsueh et al (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;153:493-503)29 with original copyright holder's permission.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation