2012
DOI: 10.1002/msj.21292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Dental Evaluation

Abstract: Typically, a patient's intraoral condition is not a chief perioperative concern. The need for proper dental care is often unmet prior to a surgical procedure. Consequently, patients presenting for surgery may possess untreated decayed teeth and/or periodontal disease. These individuals may be harboring a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, and an additional three papers were included after checking the references of the relevant selected reviews and studies (see Table 1). 1254…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, and an additional three papers were included after checking the references of the relevant selected reviews and studies (see Table 1). 1254…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis against infective endocarditis have changed dramatically over the past ten years, 9,10,12 and the relationship between a patient's dentition and overall systemic health has been studied extensively. 13 The inclusion of a preoperative dental examination has been used effectively in surgical procedures, 13 but little data are available on the oral health of children with congenital heart disease, especially those from a developing country.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancellations of paediatric cardiac procedures due to poor oral health results in delay of needed interventions, thereby increasing risk of morbidity and mortality, 9 and may create a substantial hardship for the patient and family. Unexpected cancellations create inefficiencies in healthcare delivery which increases resource and labour costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a mini-cycle improvement quality project of 14 weeks. Due to the small number of referrals per week (n = [1-6]) (Appendix 2), and the small number of total referrals per provider over the intervention period (n = [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]), overall adherence rates were easily skewed week-to-week by the performance of a single provider. For this reason, the adherence of all providers was calculated together as an average, to determine the success of the intervention.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%