2003
DOI: 10.1159/000072097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Chemotherapy in Advanced Bladder Cancer: Part I Neoadjuvant Treatment

Abstract: Despite local tumor control, patients with locally advanced bladder cancer or lymphogenic metastasized urothelial carcinoma are at risk for systemic progress. Radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder tumors. Pelvic lymphadenectomy remains an integral part of the surgical treatment. However, the extent of the lymph node dissection depends on its diagnostic or curative intent and is more controversial. In addition, further treatment options such as systemic chemotherapy or co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2003, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-8710 randomized controlled trial demonstrated improved survival and pathologic down-staging in association with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) administered before RC in patients with MIBC ( 7 ), and the results from subsequent meta-analyses have also suggested significant benefits associated with NAC ( 8 9 ). However, the adoption of NAC for MIBC has been slow and inconsistent among oncologists, and only 1%-12% of MIBC patients receive NAC ( 6 7 10 11 12 13 ). Several explanations have been proposed for the slow uptake of the use of NAC for MIBC, including the significant toxicities of the chemotherapeutic agents, the higher proportions of older MIBC patients with multiple comorbidities, poor renal function, and poor performance statuses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-8710 randomized controlled trial demonstrated improved survival and pathologic down-staging in association with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) administered before RC in patients with MIBC ( 7 ), and the results from subsequent meta-analyses have also suggested significant benefits associated with NAC ( 8 9 ). However, the adoption of NAC for MIBC has been slow and inconsistent among oncologists, and only 1%-12% of MIBC patients receive NAC ( 6 7 10 11 12 13 ). Several explanations have been proposed for the slow uptake of the use of NAC for MIBC, including the significant toxicities of the chemotherapeutic agents, the higher proportions of older MIBC patients with multiple comorbidities, poor renal function, and poor performance statuses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%