2013
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
122
36
21
1
Citation Types
6
94
0
6
Year Published
Range
2013
20132026
2026Publication Types
Select...
144
14
11
3
Relationship
1
171
Authors
Journals
Cited by 172 publications
(106 citation statements)
References 63 publications
6
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The other prognostic factors found significant in multivariate analysis for ORR in this study were in concordance with other published data in particular age [ 22 ], tumor size [ 5 ], and nodal status [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The other prognostic factors found significant in multivariate analysis for ORR in this study were in concordance with other published data in particular age [ 22 ], tumor size [ 5 ], and nodal status [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
JAMA Netw Open
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous meta-analyses included both patients with AEG and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 5 , 48 , 49 only 1 of the 2 modalities preoperative chemotherapy or CRT, 50 or studies using chemotherapy as well as those using CRT without being able to compare the 2 modalities by integrating direct and indirect evidence in an NMA. 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“… 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found. One meta-analysis 51 exclusively assessed safety and found no differences between preoperative therapy plus surgery and surgery alone but did not include data pertaining only to patients with AEG.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In addition, the results of multivariate analysis showed the significant effects of age, performance status, and tumor site on survival. [ 36 ] Our results confirmed that R0 resection has a significantly lower HR for death compared to R1 resection. Nevertheless, other predictors that were significant in the univariate analysis were insignificant in the multivariate analysis, possibly due to the smaller sample size.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 79%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The other prognostic factors found significant in multivariate analysis for ORR in this study were in concordance with other published data in particular age [ 22 ], tumor size [ 5 ], and nodal status [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
JAMA Netw Open
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous meta-analyses included both patients with AEG and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 5 , 48 , 49 only 1 of the 2 modalities preoperative chemotherapy or CRT, 50 or studies using chemotherapy as well as those using CRT without being able to compare the 2 modalities by integrating direct and indirect evidence in an NMA. 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“… 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found. One meta-analysis 51 exclusively assessed safety and found no differences between preoperative therapy plus surgery and surgery alone but did not include data pertaining only to patients with AEG.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In addition, the results of multivariate analysis showed the significant effects of age, performance status, and tumor site on survival. [ 36 ] Our results confirmed that R0 resection has a significantly lower HR for death compared to R1 resection. Nevertheless, other predictors that were significant in the univariate analysis were insignificant in the multivariate analysis, possibly due to the smaller sample size.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 79%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The other prognostic factors found significant in multivariate analysis for ORR in this study were in concordance with other published data in particular age [ 22 ], tumor size [ 5 ], and nodal status [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
JAMA Netw Open
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous meta-analyses included both patients with AEG and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 5 , 48 , 49 only 1 of the 2 modalities preoperative chemotherapy or CRT, 50 or studies using chemotherapy as well as those using CRT without being able to compare the 2 modalities by integrating direct and indirect evidence in an NMA. 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“… 7 , 13 , 51 In line with our results, they consistently showed the advantage of preoperative CRT plus surgery or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery over surgery alone with regard to survival and surrogate outcomes like downstaging and complete resection. 5 , 7 , 13 , 47 , 48 , 50 Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also assessed, and no relevant differences between the modalities were found. One meta-analysis 51 exclusively assessed safety and found no differences between preoperative therapy plus surgery and surgery alone but did not include data pertaining only to patients with AEG.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In addition, the results of multivariate analysis showed the significant effects of age, performance status, and tumor site on survival. [ 36 ] Our results confirmed that R0 resection has a significantly lower HR for death compared to R1 resection. Nevertheless, other predictors that were significant in the univariate analysis were insignificant in the multivariate analysis, possibly due to the smaller sample size.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 79%