2015
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1501035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether bridging anticoagulation is necessary for patients with atrial fibrillation who need an interruption in warfarin treatment for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure. We hypothesized that forgoing bridging anticoagulation would be noninferior to bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of perioperative arterial thromboembolism and would be superior to bridging with respect to major bleeding. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
557
3
36

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 981 publications
(642 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
13
557
3
36
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent randomized controlled trial,28 the 30‐day postoperative thrombotic risks were 0.4% and 0.3% in the no‐bridging and bridging groups, respectively, which are similar to our pooled DOAC risk of 0.41%. Similarly, the risk of postoperative thromboembolism was 0.4% overall in a recently published prospective registry evaluating the perioperative interruption of VKA 29.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a recent randomized controlled trial,28 the 30‐day postoperative thrombotic risks were 0.4% and 0.3% in the no‐bridging and bridging groups, respectively, which are similar to our pooled DOAC risk of 0.41%. Similarly, the risk of postoperative thromboembolism was 0.4% overall in a recently published prospective registry evaluating the perioperative interruption of VKA 29.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When interruption of OAC is required, bridging does not seem to be beneficial, except in patients with mechanical heart valves: In a randomized trial of 1884 patients with AF, interruption of anticoagulation was non-inferior to heparin bridging for the outcome of arterial thrombo-embolism (incidence of 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively) and resulted in a lower risk of major bleeding (1.3% and 3.2%, respectively). 502 OAC interruptions should be minimized to prevent stroke. 9.6 Management of bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation 9.6.1 Management of minor, moderate, and severe bleeding General assessment of an anticoagulated patient with AF experiencing a bleeding event should include the assessment of bleeding site, onset, and severity of the bleeding, the time-point of last intake of OAC and other antithrombotic drugs, and other factors influencing bleeding risk such as CKD, alcohol abuse, and concurrent medications.…”
Section: Bridging Periods Off Oral Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies have examined the risks of bleeding and of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/SE) associated with perioperative heparin bridging anticoagulation in patients with NVAF 3, 4, 5, 6. However, no studies have investigated bridging risks during VKA initiation in outpatient settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%