2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder: Results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Table 1 shows a summary of the RFS, CSS and overall studies. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] The RFS after ORC was affected by the stage of disease, with a 75%, 60% and 30% long-term disease control rate for organ-confined, extravesical and LN-positive disease, respectively. 45 Mmeje et al showed that the use of any chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in OS, with 68% of patients at 36 months as compared with 36% of patients who did not receive any chemotherapy, among a total of 275 patients who underwent RARC.…”
Section: Oncological Outcomes and Comparison With Orc Or Lrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…43 Table 1 shows a summary of the RFS, CSS and overall studies. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] The RFS after ORC was affected by the stage of disease, with a 75%, 60% and 30% long-term disease control rate for organ-confined, extravesical and LN-positive disease, respectively. 45 Mmeje et al showed that the use of any chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in OS, with 68% of patients at 36 months as compared with 36% of patients who did not receive any chemotherapy, among a total of 275 patients who underwent RARC.…”
Section: Oncological Outcomes and Comparison With Orc Or Lrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Comparison of ORC oncological outcomes of RARC were similar in controlled, propensity-matched and randomized controlled studies. 51,55,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63] RARC has less overall perioperative complications, greater LNYs, less EBL, less need for perioperative transfusion and a shorter LOS; however, these studies are not sufficient to determine differences in cancer recurrence, and further clinical studies are required in the future. Only one study has shown a benefit of OS for patients receiving RARC.…”
Section: Oncological Outcomes and Comparison With Orc Or Lrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…36,37 On review of the literature, we identified 10 studies with RARC followed by ICUD (Table 2). 13,14,26,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The IRCC study retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes in 935 patients undergoing ICUD (n = 167) and ECUD (n = 768) followed by RARC. 37 Although there were no statistically significant differences in the 90-day complication rates, the ICUD group tended to have fewer overall complications (P = 0.059), significantly fewer gastrointestinal complications (P < 0.001) and lower transfusion rates (P = 0.02).…”
Section: Icud After Rarcmentioning
confidence: 99%