Perioperative and long-term outcome after ascending aortic and arch repair with elephant trunk and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Gombert, Alexander; Ketting, Shirley; Rückbeil, Marcia Viviane; Hundertmark, Ann-Kathrin; Barbati, Mohammad E.; Keschenau, Paula R.; Pedersoli, Federico; Schurink, Geert Willem H.; Mees, Barend; Kotelis, Drosos; Jacobs, Michael J.

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.026

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical workers are often unable to sum up quantitative and accurate medical information from ultrasonic images by naked eyes. Medical image analyses and processing technologies solve this dilemma and become important helpers of clinical diagnoses [ 23 – 25 ]. The purpose of further analyses and clarification is to help clinicians diagnose the disease more accurately and quickly and obtain more in-depth information of the disease.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Account of Deep Learning-Based Ultrasonic Image Feature in the Diagnosis of Severe Sepsis Complicated with Acute Kidney Injury

Zhijia

2022

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was aimed at analyzing the diagnostic value of convolutional neural network models on account of deep learning for severe sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury and providing an effective theoretical reference for the clinical use of ultrasonic image diagnoses. 50 patients with severe sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury and 50 healthy volunteers were selected in this study. They all underwent ultrasound scans. Different deep learning convolutional neural network models dense convolutional network (DenseNet121), Google inception net (GoogLeNet), and Microsoft’s residual network (ResNet) were used for training and diagnoses. Then, the diagnostic results were compared with professional image physicians’ artificial diagnoses. The results showed that accuracy and sensitivity of the three deep learning algorithms were significantly higher than professional image physicians’ artificial diagnoses. Besides, the error rates of the three algorithm models for severe sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury were significantly lower than professional physicians’ artificial diagnoses. The areas under curves (AUCs) of the three algorithms were significantly higher than AUCs of doctors’ diagnosis results. The loss function parameters of DenseNet121 and GoogLeNet were significantly lower than that of ResNet, with the statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in training time of ResNet, GoogLeNet, and DenseNet121 algorithms under deep learning, as the convergence was reached after 700 times, 700 times, and 650 times, respectively ( P > 0.05 ). In conclusion, the value of the three algorithms on account of deep learning in the diagnoses of severe sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury was higher than professional physicians’ artificial judgments and had great clinical value for the diagnoses and treatments of the disease.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%