2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(01)02268-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative administration of single, high-dose of ATG-Fresenius-S as an induction immunosuppressive therapy in cadaveric renal transplantation: preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Indeed, numerous studies have shown similar clinical outcomes with rATG induction therapy despite widely varying dosing schemes; these include every-otherday dosing, withholding doses on the basis of absolute CD3 counts, and administering the total rATG as a 1time infusion, among others. 13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Outpatient peripheral administration of rATG is an absolute necessity to facilitate a process such as the one presented here. Going strictly by the package insert, the use of rATG in this capacity would be considered inappropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Indeed, numerous studies have shown similar clinical outcomes with rATG induction therapy despite widely varying dosing schemes; these include every-otherday dosing, withholding doses on the basis of absolute CD3 counts, and administering the total rATG as a 1time infusion, among others. 13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Outpatient peripheral administration of rATG is an absolute necessity to facilitate a process such as the one presented here. Going strictly by the package insert, the use of rATG in this capacity would be considered inappropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1-year actuarial patient and graft survival were 97% and 92%, respectively. Bolus ATG was evaluated in cadaveric renal transplantation by Samsel et al [12], reporting that the rejection rate in bolus group was significantly lower than in control. No significant side effects or serious adverse events in both groups were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%