2008
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0805.0349
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periods and elementary real numbers

Masahiko Yoshinaga

Abstract: The periods, introduced by Kontsevich and Zagier, form a class of complex numbers which contains all algebraic numbers and several transcendental quantities. Little has been known about qualitative properties of periods. In this paper, we compare the periods with hierarchy of real numbers induced from computational complexities. In particular we prove that periods can be effectively approximated by elementary rational Cauchy sequences. As an application, we exhibit a computable real number which is not a perio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can extend the Theorem 1.1 for the whole set of periods P kz ⊂ C considering representations of the real and imaginary part respectively. Such a representation for a period p is called a geometric semi-canonical representation of p. This kind of representation was also suggested by M. Yoshinaga in [Yos08,p. 13] and assumed by J. Wan in [Wan11] in order to develop a degree theory for periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We can extend the Theorem 1.1 for the whole set of periods P kz ⊂ C considering representations of the real and imaginary part respectively. Such a representation for a period p is called a geometric semi-canonical representation of p. This kind of representation was also suggested by M. Yoshinaga in [Yos08,p. 13] and assumed by J. Wan in [Wan11] in order to develop a degree theory for periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, it is conjectured that the basis of the natural logarithm e and Euler's constant γ E are not periods. Although there are uncountably many numbers, which are not periods, only very recently an example for a number which is not a period has been found [18]. We need a few basic properties of periods: The set of periods P is a Q-algebra [17,19].…”
Section: Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is conjectured that the basis of the natural logarithm e and Euler's constant γ E are not periods. Although there are uncountably many numbers, which are not periods, only very recently an example for a number which is not a period has been found [76].…”
Section: Feynman Integrals and Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%