Periodontal Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Studies

Shaikh, Muhammad Saad; Ullah, Rizwan; Lone, Mohid Abrar; Matabdin, Hesham; Khan, Fahad; Zafar, Muhammad Sohail

doi:10.2217/rme-2019-0019

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 114 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29 The United States was also the country with the largest number of papers in other bibliometric studies in different areas of dentistry. 11,12 It may result from the fact that some of the world's leading research centres are located in the United States, where more funding is invested in research. 30 The lower presence of Asia, 31,32 The choice of data source influences the analysis and the outcomes of bibliometric studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis

Mattos

Perazzo

Vargas‐Ferreira

et al. 2020

Comm Dent Oral Epid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This quali-quantitative study analysed the 100 most-cited papers in core dental public health (DPH) journals focusing on understanding international knowledge production. Methods: The DPH journals were selected from titles and scopes at Web of Science Core Collection database up to March 2020. Further comparisons were performed at Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Some bibliometric parameters were extracted as follows: title, number of citations, citation density (number of citations per year), first author's country, year of publication, study design and subject. VOSviewer software was used to create graphical bibliometric maps. Results: Papers were ranked by the total number of citations, which ranged from 104 to 1,019, and six papers were cited more than 400 times. Papers were published from 1974 to 2013, mainly in Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. Most frequent study designs were cross-sectional (30%) and nonsystematic review (25%). Most papers were from Europe (54%) and North America (31%). First authors were predominantly from the United Kingdom (17%), United States of America (17%) and Canada (14%). VOSviewer map of co-authorship demonstrated the existence of clusters in the research collaboration. Although epidemiology was the most frequent subject (84%), health services research presented eight times higher citation density. Conclusions: Top 100 most-cited papers in core DPH journals were predominantly observational studies from Anglo-Saxon countries. Top 100 most-cited papers in core DPH journals tend to be cross-sectional studies carried out in the United States with highest citation in health services research. Locker D, Petersen PE and Sheiham A are a landmark for DPH field. K E Y W O R D S bibliometric analysis, bibliometrics, citation index, dental public health, public health | 41 MATTOS eT Al. MATTOS eT Al. milestones for oral health in the world. Those citations pictured that dental public health investigations spread along time and beyond geographic barriers. This study is helpful for journal editors to better understand the relevance of DPH papers in the international scientific scenario. The knowledge of topics, study designs and authors more frequently cited by peers can help policymakers, clinicians and researchers choose scientific evidence for their decision-making processes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis

Mattos

Perazzo

Vargas‐Ferreira

et al. 2020

Comm Dent Oral Epid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One interesting observation was that, in comparison with the relevant present results, i.e. the papers highly cited within the period 2004-2018, the 2019 Shaikh et al [34] report included only 11 of the 18 periodontal regeneration papers listed in Table 1. Seven papers, i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…The H-Classic Index (HCI) is a bibliometric index, proposed by Martıńez and coworkers [33], which is sensitive to the citation practices of any research discipline. Recently, some studies using bibliometric methods have been used to investigate the literature on periodontal regeneration [24,34]. Gutiérrez-Vela et al [24] have identified a significant increase in the literature related to this field, and Shaikh et al [34] have highlighted the most influential papers for the period 2004-2018.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A bibliometric study of the top cited papers related to periodontal regeneration

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report identifies the top cited papers in the field of periodontal regeneration since inception of the concept. Using the H-classics approach, 132 papers published between 1970 and 2012 were identified, with 230.0 ± 175.6 (mean ± SD) citations and 10.4 ± 11.5 citations/year. There were 46 clinical reports, 28 animal studies, 23 in vitro studies, 30 reviews, 3 systematic reviews, and 2 combined animal and in vitro studies. Analysis of covariance showed that institution number (≥3, P = 0.011), journal impact factor at publication (>3.0, P = 0.001) and study type (in vitro/reviews vs. clinical trials/animal studies, P = 0.024) were significantly associated with citations/year. This study has characterized the most influential literature in the field of periodontal regeneration and serves as a quick reference resource.

show abstract

“…The academic scientific research has gradually increased in the last years following the world trend and today represents an important element for university academic careers in the bibliometric disciplines [4,5]. Scientometrics is the discipline that evaluates the quality of the scientific production by techniques and indicators able to measure the bibliographic data and the process of scholarly communication [6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Production in Dentistry: The National Panorama through a Bibliometric Study of Italian Academies

Lorusso

Inchingolo

Scarano

2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The academic scientific research in the field of dentistry has rapidly increased in the last 20 years under the pressure of the multidisciplinary technological advancements and the growing demand for new predictable and cost-effective techniques and materials. The aim of the present investigation was to analyze the academic scientific production conducted by Italian Academies and Dental Schools. Methods. The list of MED/28 academic researchers, associate and full professors, and academic affiliations was collected from the national database of CINECA to evaluate the scientific output of the Italian Universities. The complete list of scientific contributions and the bibliometric parameters were recorded in the Scopus database. Results. The scientific production of 37 Italian Universities, 416 researchers, and 23689 papers was evaluated. The measurement of total academic papers, citations, h-index, and relative citation ratio (RCR) was calculated. The study data showed an increase of the academic scientific production over the last 5 years. Conclusions. The results presented show how scientific research is increasingly pursued by dental clinicians.

show abstract

Periodontal Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Studies

Cited by 16 publications

References 114 publications

Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis

Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis

A bibliometric study of the top cited papers related to periodontal regeneration

Scientific Production in Dentistry: The National Panorama through a Bibliometric Study of Italian Academies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About