Periodical capacity setting methods for make-to-order multi-machine production systems

Abstract

The paper presents different periodical capacity setting methods for make-to-order, multi-machine production systems with stochastic customer required lead times and stochastic processing times to improve service level and tardiness. These methods are developed as decision support when capacity flexibility exists, such as, a certain range of possible working hours a week for example. The methods differ in the amount of information used whereby all are based on the cumulated capacity demand at each machine. In a simulation study the methods’ impact on service level and tardiness is compared to a constant provided capacity for a single and a multi-machine setting. It is shown that the tested capacity setting methods can lead to an increase in service level and a decrease in average tardiness in comparison to a constant provided capacity. The methods using information on processing time and customer required lead time distribution perform best. The results found in this paper can help practitioners to make efficient use of their flexible capacity.

Applying a Hybrid Model to Solve the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem with Preventive Maintenance, Sequence-Dependent Setup Times and Unknown Processing Times

“…Manufacturing companies can improve the key performance indicators by adjusting production capacity (Altendorfer et al 2014). Effective scheduling is a way for companies to improve their production throughput without using extra resources (Topcuoglu et al 2002).…”

Developing a Calibrated Discrete Event Simulation Model of Shops of a Dutch Phone and Subscription Retailer During COVID-19 to Evaluate Shift Plans to Reduce Waiting Times

“…In the past decades, much research has been performed regarding queueing systems, whereby two literature streams are dominating. On the one hand, analytical solutions are developed (Hübl and Altendorfer 2015;Altendorfer and Jodlbauer 2011;Altendorfer and Minner 2011;Buzacott and Shanthikumar 1993;de Groot and Hübl Medhi 1991) and on the other hand, those queueing problems that are most likely real-world problems are solved with discrete event simulation (Altendorfer et al 2014;Hübl et al 2011). Due to the stochastic nature of real-world problems, it is often the case that analytical models and techniques cannot represent a particular queueing system adequately (Kolker 2010;Shortle et al 2018).…”

State-dependent service rates in make-to-order shops: an assessment by simulation

“…state-dependent processing times, machine availability or material availability (e.g. Kenne & Gharbi, 2001;Mason et al, 2005;Galbreth et al, 2012;Altendorfer et al, 2014) such factors are state-independent. In fact, state-independent variation in operator processing times should be avoided, since it may lead to blocking and starvation in tightly coupled systems (Folgado et al, 2015).…”