2013
DOI: 10.1137/120883876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic Solutions in the Generalized Sitnikov $(N+1)$-Body Problem

Abstract: This paper studies a special restricted (N + 1)-body problem which can be reduced to the Sitnikov problem with an appropriate positive parameter. According to the number of bodies we prove the existence (or nonexistence) of a finite (or infinite) number of symmetric families of periodic solutions. These solutions bifurcate from the equilibrium at the center of mass of the system. Introduction.In celestial mechanics there is a restricted 3-body problem known as the Sitnikov problem. In this problem we have two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar work was done independently by Marchesin and Castihlo in [16]. Existence results were extended to a generalized Sitnikov problem, which involves more than two masses in a planar configuration whose orbits are ellispses, by Rivera in 2013 (see [25]). Interestingly, the results of Rivera's work included an upper bound of 234 masses in the planar configuration needed for the results to hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similar work was done independently by Marchesin and Castihlo in [16]. Existence results were extended to a generalized Sitnikov problem, which involves more than two masses in a planar configuration whose orbits are ellispses, by Rivera in 2013 (see [25]). Interestingly, the results of Rivera's work included an upper bound of 234 masses in the planar configuration needed for the results to hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The estimation of the upper bound r 0 for the canonical solutions deserves a comment; it does not depend on the branch and has to be valid for the whole [0, ξ * ] interval of initial conditions. We have computed R 0 (ξ) (equation (21)) with 0 ≤ ξ ≤ ξ * (see figure 3) and its supreme value r 0 . In tables 2 and 3 we list the coefficients that do depend on the specific branch p for N= 1 and N = 3 respectively:Ê, ∆ (0), K and µ 0 .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the existence of periodic motions for the plus one body in the Sitnikov problem, we refer to [10,12] where the authors prove the existence of families of symmetric periodic orbits which depend continuously on the eccentricity of the primaries, by means of the Leray-Schauder continuation method. Using the same technique, in [15] the author proves that these families also exist in a particular generalization of the Sitnikov problem where the number of primaries is n ≥ 2. More precisely, in [15] the authors find the existence of periodic motions in a restricted (n + 1)-body problem where each primary body is at the vertex of a regular n-gon and moves on elliptic orbits lying in the xy-plane around their barycenter and the plus one body moves on the z-axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%