Handbook of Solid State Chemistry 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9783527691036.hsscvol5005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic Local Møller–Plesset Perturbation Theory of Second Order for Solids

Abstract: Pseudopotentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Given that the majority of materials is potentially metallic and taking into account the notorious problems of HF theory to deal with that, the overwhelming success of DFT for solid-state questions 2 is easily understandable, in particular when DFT is combined with plane waves and the pseudopotential/PAW approximations allowing to structurally optimize whatever kind of material based on exact Hellmann-Feynman forces. For certain nonmetallic materials, however, post-HF approaches are a powerful alternative, 3 as are semi-empirical approximations to the HF approach for large systems. 4 By this, the repertory of the types of the ground states accessible to the available software is significantly restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Given that the majority of materials is potentially metallic and taking into account the notorious problems of HF theory to deal with that, the overwhelming success of DFT for solid-state questions 2 is easily understandable, in particular when DFT is combined with plane waves and the pseudopotential/PAW approximations allowing to structurally optimize whatever kind of material based on exact Hellmann-Feynman forces. For certain nonmetallic materials, however, post-HF approaches are a powerful alternative, 3 as are semi-empirical approximations to the HF approach for large systems. 4 By this, the repertory of the types of the ground states accessible to the available software is significantly restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class exploits locality to limit the auxiliary expansion based on the proximity to the target pair density. [36][37][38]41,43,44 The locality could arise from the system itself, 43 an explicit use of a local metric other than the Coulomb operator, 41 or a combination of both. 36 The other class insists on a global, Coulomb metricbased GDF and accelerates the integral evaluation by calculating the slowly convergent, long-range part separately, e.g., in reciprocal space using a PW basis 14,45 or in real space using a multipole expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%