2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges: Do they represent an ictal pattern requiring treatment?

Abstract: The goal of this report is to review periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs), particularly their associated symptoms, the possibility that the pattern represents a focal status epilepticus, and finally the usefulness of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The associated symptoms often include an "altered state of consciousness" or "confusional state," but also more specific symptoms have been noted, such as nystagmus retractorius, cortical blindness, depression, apraxia, amnesia, hemianopsia, hemiparesis,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three subgroups did not differ by the number of patients who had epileptiform activity on the follow-up EEG, but the presence of epileptiform activity on follow-up EEG was almost a certain marker for recurrent seizures in patients with NCS, which was not the case in patients with only PLEDs. It is quite likely that the epileptiform activity seen in four of the seven PLEDs only patients with no seizures during followup may be a residual 'forme fruste' of the PLEDs, which have been claimed to be just an epiphenomenon [21]. Another possible and more likely explanation is that these patients may develop seizures if followed for longer periods of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The three subgroups did not differ by the number of patients who had epileptiform activity on the follow-up EEG, but the presence of epileptiform activity on follow-up EEG was almost a certain marker for recurrent seizures in patients with NCS, which was not the case in patients with only PLEDs. It is quite likely that the epileptiform activity seen in four of the seven PLEDs only patients with no seizures during followup may be a residual 'forme fruste' of the PLEDs, which have been claimed to be just an epiphenomenon [21]. Another possible and more likely explanation is that these patients may develop seizures if followed for longer periods of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PLEDs are resistant to treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). 22 In this regard, PLEDs resemble focal interictal spikes more than seizures. It may very well be the case that PLEDs represent neurophysiological processes that are distributed along an interictal-ictal continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial efforts have been made to standardize critical care EEG terminology and to associate EEG patterns with clinical course and outcome. [1][2][3][4][5] One of the main indications for CEEG is to detect electrographic seizures. Most electroencephalographers use a definition of seizures that includes a minimal duration of 10 seconds, [2][3][4][5][6][7] which reflects the typical duration of partial seizures in patients with chronic epilepsy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] One of the main indications for CEEG is to detect electrographic seizures. Most electroencephalographers use a definition of seizures that includes a minimal duration of 10 seconds, [2][3][4][5][6][7] which reflects the typical duration of partial seizures in patients with chronic epilepsy. [8][9][10] Rhythmic ictal-appearing patterns lasting less than 10 seconds have been described in neonates under different acronyms: brief rhythmic discharges (BRDs), brief electroencephalography rhythmic discharges (BERDs), and brief ictal rhythmic discharges (BIRDs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%