1983
DOI: 10.4064/fm-117-1-81-84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic homeomorphisms of chainable continua

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chainable continua provide a context that is suitably linear for portions of Sarkovskii's proof to be extended. However, Sarkovskii's Theorem does not hold for maps of indecomposable chainable continua (see [5] and [6]). It is for hereditarily decomposable chainable continua that the folding patterns of maps with prescribed periodic orbits mimic those of maps of the real line.…”
Section: Kuratowski Mapsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chainable continua provide a context that is suitably linear for portions of Sarkovskii's proof to be extended. However, Sarkovskii's Theorem does not hold for maps of indecomposable chainable continua (see [5] and [6]). It is for hereditarily decomposable chainable continua that the folding patterns of maps with prescribed periodic orbits mimic those of maps of the real line.…”
Section: Kuratowski Mapsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Lewis [8] proved that for an n > 1 there exists a period-^ homeomorphism on the pseudo-arc. Since a periodic homeomorphism generates a finite and therefore compact group, we have the following.…”
Section: = {D} = {«-'Imumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe briefly here an example of a map of a chainable (indecomposable) continuum into itself having a point of period 3 but none of period 2, and then proceed with the proof of the theorem. A better example was given earlier by Wayne Lewis [6], who showed that for every « there is a chainable continuum with a periodic homeomorphism of period «. The general outline of the proof of Theorem 1.1 is patterned on that of Block, Guckenheimer, Misiurewicz and Young [1] as described in Devaney's book [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%