1986
DOI: 10.1080/00036818608839591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic boundary value problems for second order integro-differential equations of volterra type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(II) a Predholm integral operator of the type (1.3) [Su}(t) = f G(s, t, u(s))ds, [2] where G(a, t, r) is continuous for 0 ^ a, t ^ 1 and r £ i ; (III) a 'delay' operator of the type Equations of the type (1.1) with S as in (1.2) have recently been considered by Aftabizadeh and Leela [1] for Dirichlet boundary conditions and by Hu and Lakshmikanthan [6] for periodic boundary conditions, using monotone iterative techniques. Based on fixed point argument, Agarwal in [2] has discussed existence of solutions to the problem (1.1) with 5 as in (1.3).…”
Section: Jcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(II) a Predholm integral operator of the type (1.3) [Su}(t) = f G(s, t, u(s))ds, [2] where G(a, t, r) is continuous for 0 ^ a, t ^ 1 and r £ i ; (III) a 'delay' operator of the type Equations of the type (1.1) with S as in (1.2) have recently been considered by Aftabizadeh and Leela [1] for Dirichlet boundary conditions and by Hu and Lakshmikanthan [6] for periodic boundary conditions, using monotone iterative techniques. Based on fixed point argument, Agarwal in [2] has discussed existence of solutions to the problem (1.1) with 5 as in (1.3).…”
Section: Jcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.PROOF: For k G N, define f k (t, x 0 , x u x 2 ) as f(t, x 0 , x u x 2 ) + zi/Jfe. Each fk satisfies (a) of Theorem 3.1 and hence for every k, there is at least one solution[6] u k e C 2 [0, 1] to the problem uW=f k(t,Su,u,u u 6 B. As in the proof of .Theorem 3.1, we now obtain a bound for «* in ||-|| 2 -norm, namely ||ujfe|| 2 ^ N, where N is independent of k. Continuity of / and 5 and the Ascoli-Arzela theorem imply the existence of a subsequence Ukj which converges to a solution of the problem (1.1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The authors developed the monotone iterative method for (1.1) based on a comparison result. As it is pointed out in [6], the method of [7] is not applicable to the general situation. Erbe and Guo studied problem (1.1) with f continuous, and k continuous and positive.…”
Section: -U"(t)--f(tu(t)ku(t))u(o)--u(en)u'(o)--u'(2n) (11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem (1.1) is studied in [8] under the assumption that f(t,u,v) is continuous and increasing in v, and in [7] for f continuous and K of Volterra type. Following the ideas of [6] we study (1.1) …”
Section: -U"(t)--f(tu(t)ku(t))u(o)--u(en)u'(o)--u'(2n) (11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation