2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05246.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Period variation and spot model for the W UMa type binary TY UMa

Abstract: We present the full VRI light curves and the times of minima of TY UMa to provide a complete photometric solution and a long‐term trend of period variation. The light curves show a high degree of asymmetry (the O'Connell effect). The maxima at 0.25 phase (Max I) are 0.021, 0.015, and 0.020 mag fainter than those at 0.75 phase (Max II) in V, R, and I, respectively. The period of TY UMa has varied in a sinusoidal way, superimposed on the long‐term upward parabolic variation. The secularly increasing rate of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The period gap is indicated by vertical dashed lines. The crosses depict ∆P/P values for 56 other close binaries with cyclical period modulations (Lanza & Rodonó 1999;Qian et al 1999Qian et al , 2000aQian et al ,b, 2002Qian et al , 2007aLanza et al 2001;Kang et al 2002;Qian 2002aQian ,b, 2003Yang & Liu 2002, 2003aZavala et al 2002;Çakırlı et al 2003;Kim et al 2003;Qian & Boonrucksar 2003;Afşar et al 2004;Lee et al 2004;Yang et al 2004Yang et al , 2007Zhu et al 2004;Borkovits et al 2005;Erdem et al 2007;Pilecki et al 2007;Szalai et al 2007). Systems with independent evidence that the observed (O−C) modulations can be explained by a third body were excluded (actually, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the observed modulation of some of the systems plotted may still be caused by a third body.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Observed Orbital Period Modulations Abovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period gap is indicated by vertical dashed lines. The crosses depict ∆P/P values for 56 other close binaries with cyclical period modulations (Lanza & Rodonó 1999;Qian et al 1999Qian et al , 2000aQian et al ,b, 2002Qian et al , 2007aLanza et al 2001;Kang et al 2002;Qian 2002aQian ,b, 2003Yang & Liu 2002, 2003aZavala et al 2002;Çakırlı et al 2003;Kim et al 2003;Qian & Boonrucksar 2003;Afşar et al 2004;Lee et al 2004;Yang et al 2004Yang et al , 2007Zhu et al 2004;Borkovits et al 2005;Erdem et al 2007;Pilecki et al 2007;Szalai et al 2007). Systems with independent evidence that the observed (O−C) modulations can be explained by a third body were excluded (actually, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the observed modulation of some of the systems plotted may still be caused by a third body.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Observed Orbital Period Modulations Abovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact binaries, also known as the W UMa stars, are low‐mass eclipsing binaries consisting of ellipsoidal components with orbital periods less than 1 d, usually in the range 0.2 < P < 0.8 d, with continuously changing brightness (Kang et al 2002; Percy 2007). They consist of solar‐type main‐sequence components which fill their Roche lobes and share a common outer envelope at the inner Lagrangian point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our LCs are asymmetric, and the main reason is the variation of spot location and size (Kang et al 2002). Considering this case, cool star-spots model was used to get better solutions.…”
Section: Photometric Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%