The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden,
SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY ACRONYM(S)AFRL/RYDH
SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER(S)AFRL-RY-WP-TP-2013-0023
DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESPAO Case Number 88ABW-2012-3102, Clearance Date 5 June 2012. Report contains color. Journal article to be published in Proc. IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium.
ABSTRACTCombining optical injection and polarization-rotated optical feedback in a semiconductor laser can induce self-referenced periodic output that is widely tunable by simply varying the dc-bias points of the master and slave lasers. We observed feedback-induced reduction of the pulsation peak linewidth by more than two orders of magnitude relative to the injection-only case. The nonlinear dynamics of the optically injected semiconductor laser can be used to minimize sensitivity to fluctuations in the operating points. Performance is negatively affected by interference between the external injection signal and residual feedback in the same polarization. Abstract-Combining optical injection and polarization-rotated optical feedback in a semiconductor laser can induce selfreferenced periodic output that is widely tunable by simply varying the dc-bias points of the master and slave lasers. We observed feedback-induced reduction of the pulsation peak linewidth by more than two orders of magnitude relative to the injection-only case. The nonlinear dynamics of the optically injected semiconductor laser can be used to minimize sensitivity to fluctuations in the operating points. Performance is negatively affected by interference between the external injection signal and residual feedback in the same polarization.
SUBJECT TERMS