2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.101691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Period adaptation of real-time control tasks with fixed-priority scheduling in cyber-physical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the increase of control period will reduce the controller performances such as response and stabilization time. Relative literatures have given detailed theory demonstrations, which we also verified during our research [40,41]. Thus, we choose the minimum control horizon which is also an ideal situation to apply to our simulation.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Generally, the increase of control period will reduce the controller performances such as response and stabilization time. Relative literatures have given detailed theory demonstrations, which we also verified during our research [40,41]. Thus, we choose the minimum control horizon which is also an ideal situation to apply to our simulation.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To evaluate the proposed co-design method, experiments are implemented in MATLAB (R2019b) and are running on a desktop PC. The experiment scripts and data can be publicly accessed 6 • To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method, we evaluate our approach on synthetically generated packets using UUnifast [10]. The network transmission speed vis 100 Mbps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network transmission speed vis 100 Mbps. The greatest 6 Toe MA1LAB code used in the experiments can be accessed at the following link:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also understood that a high confidence in the modelling does not (and should not) lead to a high confidence in decision making, as the former is often dependant on assumptions that are not always true. It is thus considered by the authors how to reduce this problem by introducing feedback based on the difference between the collected data trace from the real system and the model output (following C4), as earlier explored in [17].…”
Section: E C5 -Robust Decision Making In the Presence Of Inaccuraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%