2018
DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perineural Versus Systemic Dexamethasone in Front-Foot Surgery Under Ankle Block

Abstract: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02904538.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We thank Dr Abdallah et al for their comments regarding our article and welcome all valuable opinions 1. However, we respectfully disagree with their statement of inaccuracy of our main conclusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We thank Dr Abdallah et al for their comments regarding our article and welcome all valuable opinions 1. However, we respectfully disagree with their statement of inaccuracy of our main conclusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The recently adoption of enhanced recovery and ambulatory programs after fasttrack orthopedic surgery protocols has sparked a renewed interest in ankle blocks [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] Dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid with minimal mineralocorticoid effect, has been commonly used to prolong the analgesic duration of PNB, either by perineural or intravenous injection. [5][6][7] Concerning the "off-label" use and potential neurotoxicity for perineural administration of dexamethasone, [8][9][10] intravenous route may be more appropriate to use in PNB, because a meta-analysis indicates those 2 routes produce equivalent analgesic effects and show comparable safety profiles. [5] Currently, various dose of intravenous dexamethasone has been suggested to improve the analgesic effects of PNB and several studies compared the effects of different dose of intravenous dexamethasone on PNB, [11][12][13] but the results were not consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%