2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05183-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perinatal outcome following induction of labor in patients with good glycemic controlled gestational diabetes: does timing matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was no statistical significance between medical history in the studied cases and the development of RDS in delivered infants; these results agree with the results cited by Hochberg et al [12] that support the link between pre-eclampsia in moms and preterm newborns with broncho-pulmonary dysplasia suggesting that chronic hypertension is protective for preterm neonates [13] . In contrast to our study, Li et al [14] concluded that maternal diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus and pregestational diabetes mellitus is connected to a higher incidence of neonatal RDS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, there was no statistical significance between medical history in the studied cases and the development of RDS in delivered infants; these results agree with the results cited by Hochberg et al [12] that support the link between pre-eclampsia in moms and preterm newborns with broncho-pulmonary dysplasia suggesting that chronic hypertension is protective for preterm neonates [13] . In contrast to our study, Li et al [14] concluded that maternal diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus and pregestational diabetes mellitus is connected to a higher incidence of neonatal RDS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nine studies in relation to diabetes were included, consisting of two Cochrane reviews [9,145], a secondary analysis of a trial that compared different treatments for mild gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [146] and six retrospective cohort studies [147][148][149][150][151][152]. With the exception of one study [145], all evaluated women with GDM, and excluded those with type I or II diabetes.…”
Section: Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies assessed the impact of different timings of IOL for women with GDM in terms of CS rates [146,148] or maternal and neonatal outcomes [151,152]. A retrospective cohort study by Hochberg et al (2019) compared outcomes for IOL at 37+0 and 38 + 6 weeks (n = 193) versus 39+0 and 40+6 weeks (n = 237) and found that the rates of composite maternal outcome and composite neonatal outcome did not differ between groups [152]. A retrospective cohort study by Vitner et al (2019) found that IOL was associated with increased risk for adverse composite neonatal outcome or NICU admission when done prior to 39 weeks [151].…”
Section: Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme was customized to account for glycemic control and fetal growth [21,22]. Well-controlled GD was diagnosed when 80% or more glucose measurements were within the range, estimated fetal weight was appropriate for gestational age, and the amniotic fluid index was normal, Fetal Diagn Ther 2022;49:77-84 DOI: 10.1159/000522203 regardless of treatment [23]. Women tested negative for the glucose tolerance test were considered nondiabetic (non-GD).…”
Section: Assessment Of Maternal and Fetal Characteristics And Ultraso...mentioning
confidence: 99%