2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perimacular retinal folds and nonaccidental injury—Yes, No, or Maybe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some continue to challenge this literature and attempt to raise controversy. [127][128][129][130] Further research is indicated to answer remaining queries. Until such time, physicians should keep an open mind to and appropriately search and test for alternate explanations while appropriately weighting the strong available evidence to ensure that a child remains protected from harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some continue to challenge this literature and attempt to raise controversy. [127][128][129][130] Further research is indicated to answer remaining queries. Until such time, physicians should keep an open mind to and appropriately search and test for alternate explanations while appropriately weighting the strong available evidence to ensure that a child remains protected from harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 -28 There is debate in the literature as to whether perimacular folds are diagnostic of retinal shaking injury and as to the causal mechanism of these folds. 25,29 Perimacular folds have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in children with head injuries caused by abuse. 25,30 In two eyes, we found perimacular retinal folds, and in one eye, this was associated with posterior vitreous separation and attachment at the site of the white fold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%