2012
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2012.57.2.0665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perils of correlating CUSUM‐transformed variables to infer ecological relationships (Breton et al. 2006; Glibert 2010)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, while supporting the cautious comment of Cloern et al (2011), we agree with those who have previously used CUSUM in ecological analysis, that comparisons of transitions in time, using CUSUM transformations, are useful for the identification of synchrony between time series.…”
supporting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, while supporting the cautious comment of Cloern et al (2011), we agree with those who have previously used CUSUM in ecological analysis, that comparisons of transitions in time, using CUSUM transformations, are useful for the identification of synchrony between time series.…”
supporting
confidence: 47%
“…In ecology, the application of CUSUM transformations for identifying links between meteorological, hydrological, and ecological patterns has recently been increasing (Adrian et al 2006;Molinero et al 2008;Breaker and Flora 2009;Briceñ o and Boyer 2010), and the combination of CUSUM charts and bootstrapping has been identified as an important tool in regime shift analysis (Andersen et al 2008). Therefore, while supporting the cautious comment of Cloern et al (2011), we agree with those who have previously used CUSUM in ecological analysis, that comparisons of transitions in time, using CUSUM transformations, are useful for the identification of synchrony between time series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was particularly interesting because of the high concentrations of NH + 4 in the Sacramento River: the correlation between potential nitrification and NH + 4 was positive and at the margins of significance (ρ = 0.71, p = 0.088). Due to the recent controversy over the ecological impacts of elevated NH + 4 concentrations in the Sacramento River (Glibert, 2010 ; Brooks et al, 2012 ; Cloern et al, 2012 ; Lancelot et al, 2012 ), there is substantial interest in quantifying the rates of NH + 4 transformations throughout the Delta. While previous work has inferred high nitrification rates in the Sacramento River due to longitudinal decreases in NH + 4 and increases in NO − 3 concentrations (Parker et al, 2012 ), no measurements of nitrification rates in the Delta exist to date.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations among non-stationary time series are spurious in the sense that the estimated coefficients are statistically significant when there are no real relationships among variables (inflated type I error rate). For example, in the analysis of fisheries time series data, spurious results are often produced by correlating cumulative-sum (CUSUM)-transformed variables because the CUSUM transformation generates nonstationary time series from stationary time series (Cloern et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%