2009
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.91b8.22057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perilesional changes of focal osteochondral defects in an ovine model and their relevance to human osteochondral injuries

Abstract: Perilesional changes of chronic focal osteochondral defects were assessed in the knees of 23 sheep. An osteochondral defect was created in the main load-bearing region of the medial condyle of the knees in a controlled, standardised manner. The perilesional cartilage was evaluated macroscopically and biopsies were taken at the time of production of the defect (T0), during a second operation one month later (T1), and after killing animals at three (T3; n = 8), four (T4; n = 8), and seven (T7; n = 8) months. All… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implant was compared to the clinically established OATS technique using a validated large animal model for degenerated critical-size cartilage defects. 22 In contrast to our first hypothesis, the OATS group did appear to have superior cartilage matrix morphology. However, histological analysis showed generally similar results between the osteochondral autograft and triphasic groups, as no significant differences were observed in the total sum of any of the 3 histological scores used for analysis.…”
Section: Journal Of Orthopaedic Research December 2010contrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implant was compared to the clinically established OATS technique using a validated large animal model for degenerated critical-size cartilage defects. 22 In contrast to our first hypothesis, the OATS group did appear to have superior cartilage matrix morphology. However, histological analysis showed generally similar results between the osteochondral autograft and triphasic groups, as no significant differences were observed in the total sum of any of the 3 histological scores used for analysis.…”
Section: Journal Of Orthopaedic Research December 2010contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…To more accurately model the chronic cartilage damage seen in human subjects undergoing cartilage repair, use of a chronic injury model may be more appropriate. 22 Based on superior in vivo results for MSC-seeded constructs in comparison to chondrocyte-seeded implants 23 and due to the demonstrated osteogenic and chondrogenic potential of MSCs, 15,18,24−28 we developed a new MSC-based triphasic construct. The objective of this study was to compare the clinically established OATS technique with triphasic MSC-seeded implants for treatment of chronic osteochondral defects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sheep represents an ideal large animal model for translational research based on MSCs, primarily to investigate orthopedic diseases, because its body weight, joint anatomy and MSC properties are comparable to humans [Guo et al, 2004;Lu et al, 2006;Mrugala et al, 2008;Hepp et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies also used the ovine stifle joint to test implants [26] and as a model for osteoarthritis [27,28], cruciate ligament reconstruction [29,30], or meniscus repair [31]. However, the classical medial parapatellar arthrotomy includes surgical patellar luxation, unnecessarily increasing the risk for postoperative complications such as patellar luxation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%