2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04627-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia: a systematic review of harms and benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realignment pelvic osteotomies such as PAO are associated with a significant risk of major complications, ranging from 5% to 37%, and sometimes lead to acetabular defects. [34][35][36] In contrast, a shelf operation does not affect the shape of the pelvic ring and only rarely interferes with future THA, if needed. 22,37,38 However, shelf operations are unable to improve the coverage of the femoral head with true acetabular articular cartilage, and they LCEA, lateral centre-edge angle; N/A, not applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realignment pelvic osteotomies such as PAO are associated with a significant risk of major complications, ranging from 5% to 37%, and sometimes lead to acetabular defects. [34][35][36] In contrast, a shelf operation does not affect the shape of the pelvic ring and only rarely interferes with future THA, if needed. 22,37,38 However, shelf operations are unable to improve the coverage of the femoral head with true acetabular articular cartilage, and they LCEA, lateral centre-edge angle; N/A, not applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complicated definition of BHD, treatment remains controversial. Periacetabular osteotomy, the standard treatment for hip dysplasia, which reorients the acetabular osseous coverage for good short-and longterm outcomes [8], is not applicable for BHD, given the invasiveness of the procedure and the associated risk of complications [42]. In recent decades, hip arthroscopy has been an effective treatment option with good outcomes for many hip pathologies [26]; however, its applicability for hip dysplasia is still in dispute due to its reported failure rate and the potential of exacerbating the instability, subsequently resulting in osteoarthritis [29,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%