Peri-operative pulse oximetry in low-income countries: a cost–effectiveness analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost–effectiveness of pulse oximetry – compared with no peri-operative monitoring – during surgery in low-income countries.MethodsWe considered the use of tabletop and portable, hand-held pulse oximeters among patients of any age undergoing major surgery in low-income countries. From earlier studies we obtained baseline mortality and the effectiveness of pulse oximeters to reduce mortality. We considered the direct costs of purchasing and maintaining pulse oximeters as well as the cost of supplementary oxygen used to treat hypoxic episodes identified by oximetry. Health benefits were measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted and benefits and costs were both discounted at 3% per year. We used recommended cost–effectiveness thresholds – both absolute and relative to gross domestic product (GDP) per capita – to assess if pulse oximetry is a cost–effective health intervention. To test the robustness of our results we performed sensitivity analyses.FindingsIn 2013 prices, tabletop and hand-held oximeters were found to have annual costs of 310 and 95 United States dollars (US$), respectively. Assuming the two types of oximeter have identical effectiveness, a single oximeter used for 22 procedures per week averted 0.83 DALYs per annum. The tabletop and hand-held oximeters cost US$ 374 and US$ 115 per DALY averted, respectively. For any country with a GDP per capita above US$ 677 the hand-held oximeter was found to be cost–effective if it prevented just 1.7% of anaesthetic-related deaths or 0.3% of peri-operative mortality. ConclusionPulse oximetry is a cost–effective intervention for low-income settings.

Practice of standard monitoring during anaesthesia in hospitals of North Kivu: a survey of health facilities of the health antenna of Butembo

“…Anaesthesia providers have agreed that pulse oximeter should be present at all time during anaesthesia despite the fact that no robust evidence claim that this reduce perioperative mortality. Pulse oximeter may help in early detection of hypoxemia, hypovolemia and cardiac arrest and thus directing the management during anaesthesia [1,3,15,16].…”

Disseminating technology in global surgery

“…Its success is attributed to careful consideration of the design specification, focusing on minimum standards and core functionalities, and building in affordable cost, durability and low‐resource environmental factors, such as limited power supply and distribution challenges. Other key disseminating strategies included LMIC user‐centred design, effective industry and local partner engagement, and, importantly, rigorous clinical evaluation.…”

Acute respiratory illness among a prospective cohort of pediatric patients using emergency medical services in India: Demographic and prehospital clinical predictors of mortality

“…Traditionally the costs of pulse oximetry were thought to be unaffordable, but recent evidence may suggest otherwise. Several pulse oximeters have been shown to be cost-effective [31], accurate [32], and validated in low resource settings. [33] This is the first study to comment on its use in prehospital systems in a LMIC.…”