2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peri-infarct depolarizations during focal ischemia in the awake Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat. Minimizing anesthesia confounds in experimental stroke

Abstract: Anesthesia profoundly impacts peri-infarct depolarizations (PIDs), but only one prior report has described their monitoring during experimental stroke in awake animals. Since temporal patterns of PID occurrence are model specific, the current study examined PID incidence during focal ischemia in the awake Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR), and documented the impact of both prior and concurrent isoflurane anesthesia. For awake recordings, electrodes were implanted under isoflurane anesthesia 1 day to 5 weeks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in our experiments where only a small number of CSDs were induced over one hour, BBB opening was transient, with spontaneous recovery within 48 hours. In the injured brain, recurrent CSDs continue to develop for many hours and even days after the initial insult (Hartings et al, 2003; Kudo et al, 2016), which might explain the longer-lasting BBB opening after brain injury. Since CSDs originating in injured brain often propagate into the normal tissue, they may explain the BBB opening in surrounding non-injured brain as well (Lapilover et al, 2012; Stoll et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, in our experiments where only a small number of CSDs were induced over one hour, BBB opening was transient, with spontaneous recovery within 48 hours. In the injured brain, recurrent CSDs continue to develop for many hours and even days after the initial insult (Hartings et al, 2003; Kudo et al, 2016), which might explain the longer-lasting BBB opening after brain injury. Since CSDs originating in injured brain often propagate into the normal tissue, they may explain the BBB opening in surrounding non-injured brain as well (Lapilover et al, 2012; Stoll et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted that such measurements in anesthetized animals at a single early time point do not provide information about the time course of CBF change and infarct progression over the hours during which final infarct distribution is determined. 58 Also, we detected no evidence in any animal for the expected perfusion responses that accompany peri-infarct depolarizations, 59 suggesting that these may have been suppressed by anesthesia either directly 60,61 or via indirect physiological effects such as hyperglycemia, 62,63 which was not assessed. Comprehensive comparisons of the time course of perfusion changes and infarct progression across substrains would provide more insight into the mechanisms underlying substrain differences.…”
Section: Vascular Anatomy and Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Cerebral ischemia generates spreading depolarization and the induction of c‐fos and c‐jun family genes in the neocortex (An et al., 1993; Blumenfeld et al., 1992; Kudo et al., 2016; Nedergaard & Hansen, 1993). The results of the present study confirmed increased c‐Fos expression in the ipsilateral cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%