2019
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1629013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfusion CT radiomics as potential prognostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 The underlying hypothesis is that this heterogeneity on imaging reflects the heterogeneity of the microenvironment (vascularization, necrosis, tumor hypoxia), which is known to be associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype in head neck cancers. 31 For the same reason, CE-CT might be more informative for radiomics than noninjected CT. 32 Four different discretization settings of voxel intensities were implemented for each textural feature. The selected feature, Zone Percentage, was predictive when calculated using the fixed bin size method with 25 HU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 The underlying hypothesis is that this heterogeneity on imaging reflects the heterogeneity of the microenvironment (vascularization, necrosis, tumor hypoxia), which is known to be associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype in head neck cancers. 31 For the same reason, CE-CT might be more informative for radiomics than noninjected CT. 32 Four different discretization settings of voxel intensities were implemented for each textural feature. The selected feature, Zone Percentage, was predictive when calculated using the fixed bin size method with 25 HU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, manual segmentation by a single radiation oncologist (IM) was performed, which is time‐consuming and is a source of interoperator variability 37 . However, manual segmentation is mainly used in head and neck cancers 32,35,38–40 as these tumors are less suitable for automatic or semi‐automatic segmentation than other tumor locations. Moreover, the delineation of the GTV often requires the expertise of a radiation oncologist, as mainly based on clinical evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast-enhanced and non-contrast CT, (contrast-enhanced) T1 and T2 MRI sequences and FDG-PET imaging were all applied for radiomics based outcome prediction (Table 2) as well as some less common imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI [28], 18F-fluorothymidine-PET [92], and perfusion CT [80]. Studies listed in Table 2 applied different analytical strategies, such as using single feature, feature combinations ("signatures", "scores") or more complex combined models; such analytical heterogeneity limits direct comparison of studies [97], and cannot be fully reflected in Table 2.…”
Section: Prediction Of Recurrence Treatment Response and Survival Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics can effectively combine all CTP parameters with spatial information to guide treatment of patients with PDAC [63]. These datadriven biomarkers and their potential to improve tumor characterization and treatment assessment are increasingly investigated [63][64][65]. A combination of CTP and radiomic features already shows to improve the prediction of response in laryngeal cancer [66].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%