Performing Crisis Management: National Repertoires of Symbolic Action and Their Usage during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Europe

Abstract

The role of the symbolic is often overlooked in the public policy literature. Yet, it is a key component of public action, particularly in crisis management. During the Covid-19 pandemic, all democratic states needed to carry out cognitive and emotional work to persuade their citizens to show solidarity and comply with heavy restrictions. The near-simultaneous occurrence of the pandemic’s first wave (March–May 2020) allows us to compare the patterns of symbolic crisis management across four European countries (France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom). Our analysis finds significant variation in governments’ usage of the symbolic. We analyse leaders’ performances (wordcraft and stagecraft) as they try to reassure citizens, unite the nation, and legitimise themselves and their decisions. Our article shows not only that national leaders pay great attention to the symbolic in the management of crises, but also that their performances differ systematically in line with their personas and distinct national political cultures.

The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…line with Mattarella's recalls of European values and solidarity [49,70]. Finally, the role of science and its achievements in fighting the pandemic crisis was seen by European institutions as an opportunity to strengthen and improve the perception of Europe and as a source of legitimation of relevant EU investments in research.…”

“…During the pandemic, Mattarella received renewed political confidence and increased trust from Italian citizens [48]. In the COVID-19 context, Mattarella--played a more "ceremonial role" [49]-given his institutional role in the parliamentary Republic-and his public appearances were aimed at providing institutional guidance and communicating a sense of unity for the country.…”

Presidents and vaccines: head of state inoculation as a tool for vaccine promotion

“…The most prominent government official is arguably the head of state. Heads of state can influence citizen’s life and attitudes, not only by implementing policies, but also by communicating with the public, both with words and symbolic actions ( 30 ). This is in line with the social identity model of leadership, according to which leaders do not simply represent citizens’ attitudes and opinions, but can also change those, be it only for the subset of citizens that perceives the leader as part of the ‘ingroup’ ( 31 , 32 ).…”