2015
DOI: 10.1080/20504721.2015.1049870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performing absolution narratives in restorative justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wederzijds begrip lijkt eerder het resultaat van herinterpretatie van de verwoorde standpunten dan van emotionele absorptie in 1 Zie voor die term Sieben & Wettergren, 2011;Bergman Blix & Wettergren, 2016;Wettergren, 2019. 2 Er zijn wel enkele aanzetten daartoe: Asmussen, 2015Asmussen, en 2018 Ik laat andere rituele theorieën hier buiten beschouwing, waaronder die van Retzinger & Scheff (1996). Zie daarvoor Van Stokkom 2002en 2019 de groep.…”
Section: Bas Van Stokkom 1 Inleidingunclassified
“…Wederzijds begrip lijkt eerder het resultaat van herinterpretatie van de verwoorde standpunten dan van emotionele absorptie in 1 Zie voor die term Sieben & Wettergren, 2011;Bergman Blix & Wettergren, 2016;Wettergren, 2019. 2 Er zijn wel enkele aanzetten daartoe: Asmussen, 2015Asmussen, en 2018 Ik laat andere rituele theorieën hier buiten beschouwing, waaronder die van Retzinger & Scheff (1996). Zie daarvoor Van Stokkom 2002en 2019 de groep.…”
Section: Bas Van Stokkom 1 Inleidingunclassified
“…The field of mediation is maturing, and through that process, mediation theory becomes less generic and more context specific. Examples include workplace mediation (Bollen, Euwema, & Munduate, 2016), victim–offender mediation (Asmussen, 2015), and court‐connected mediation (Riskin & Welsh, 2008). The study of agreements and our suggestion for a conceptual differentiation of agreements in various settings contribute to this work.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victims and offenders may be divided into those described as 'otherregarding' and those described as 'self-regarding' (Daly, 2003). This classification means that the former group may have interests in communicating with the other party, while the latter group may not (Armour & Umbreit, 2018;Asmussen, 2015). Some of their attitudes may already be oriented towards achieving restorative goals prior to the face-to-face dialogue, whereas others may not.…”
Section: Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%