Proceedings 1997 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems
DOI: 10.1109/icpads.1997.652594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of the PS/sup 2/ parallel storage and processing system for tomographic image visualization

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a new approach for developing parallel I/O-and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], a system is described that can process images over 100 times larger used by tomosynthesis. Reconstruction algorithms used by computerized tomography (CT) are not able to produce 3D high-resolution images for practical use.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a system is described that can process images over 100 times larger used by tomosynthesis. Reconstruction algorithms used by computerized tomography (CT) are not able to produce 3D high-resolution images for practical use.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining parallel disk access operations (in Figure 6 reading extents from disks) and processing operations as desired enables building highly pipelined applications incorporating the required parallel file system components [Messerli97].…”
Section: Figure 5 Syntax Of a Parallel While Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use IBM-DPES 31080, IBM-DCAS 32160, CONNER CFP1080S, SEAGATE ST52160N and SEAGATE ST32155N disks which have a measured mean read data transfer throughput of 3.5 MBytes/s and a mean latency time, i.e. seek time + rotational latency time, of 12.2 ms [Messerli97]. Thus, when accessing 51 KBytes blocks, i.e.…”
Section: Performances and Scalability Analysis Of The Image Slice Extmentioning
confidence: 99%