1999
DOI: 10.1088/1464-4258/1/2/027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of optical multi-chip-module interconnects: comparing guided-wave and free-space pathways

Abstract: We simulate and compare optical transmission efficiencies, throughputs and interconnection lengths of free-space and POF-based guided-wave multi-chip-module optical interconnection demonstrators for different types of microcavity emitters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these and other types of limiting factors it is important to notice that for this type of free-space interconnection modules all the different performance analyses converge to the same conclusions: interconnect densities of 10 3 /cm 2 at around 1 Gb/s bit rate can be achieved for passively cooled chips, which corresponds to an aggregate throughput capacity of 1Tb/s.cm 2 , while actively cooled systems could even perform aggregate bandwidths of several Tb/s.cm 2 over future inter-and intra-MCM interconnection distances [19][20][21][22]. The performances of both plastic optical fibre wave-guide and free-space optical pathway blocks have previously been compared [20]. As a general conclusion one can say that while both approaches have the potential for Tbits/s.cm 2 fire-hose data handling capacity the rigid free-space module and the more flexible guided-wave approach are complementary in that the first is better suited to bridge distances smaller than a few centimeters while the latter is more appropriate for interconnection lengths of several centimeters and more [20].…”
Section: Figure 3 Channel Density Versus Interconnection Lengthmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notwithstanding these and other types of limiting factors it is important to notice that for this type of free-space interconnection modules all the different performance analyses converge to the same conclusions: interconnect densities of 10 3 /cm 2 at around 1 Gb/s bit rate can be achieved for passively cooled chips, which corresponds to an aggregate throughput capacity of 1Tb/s.cm 2 , while actively cooled systems could even perform aggregate bandwidths of several Tb/s.cm 2 over future inter-and intra-MCM interconnection distances [19][20][21][22]. The performances of both plastic optical fibre wave-guide and free-space optical pathway blocks have previously been compared [20]. As a general conclusion one can say that while both approaches have the potential for Tbits/s.cm 2 fire-hose data handling capacity the rigid free-space module and the more flexible guided-wave approach are complementary in that the first is better suited to bridge distances smaller than a few centimeters while the latter is more appropriate for interconnection lengths of several centimeters and more [20].…”
Section: Figure 3 Channel Density Versus Interconnection Lengthmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This causes the channel density to drop with increasing interconnection length and limits the total throughput per chip area for an interconnection length beyond a couple of centimeters [20]. Notwithstanding these and other types of limiting factors it is important to notice that for this type of free-space interconnection modules all the different performance analyses converge to the same conclusions: interconnect densities of 10 3 /cm 2 at around 1 Gb/s bit rate can be achieved for passively cooled chips, which corresponds to an aggregate throughput capacity of 1Tb/s.cm 2 , while actively cooled systems could even perform aggregate bandwidths of several Tb/s.cm 2 over future inter-and intra-MCM interconnection distances [19][20][21][22]. The performances of both plastic optical fibre wave-guide and free-space optical pathway blocks have previously been compared [20].…”
Section: Figure 3 Channel Density Versus Interconnection Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 On the research side studies are in progress for the construction of optical backplanes 19,20 and on micro-optical components for interchip and intrachip communications, for example, at Vrije Universiteit Brussel. 21,22…”
Section: E Intrachip and Multichip-module Interconnectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of studies on FSOI systems, its alignment, tolerancing, and packaging. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In the present study, we approached the problem from a statistical point of view that was focused on the development of a probabilistic relationship between the system performance and tolerance variables in the form of a prediction equation. Such an equation could then serve as the basis for the design, evaluation, and optimization of the FSOI system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%