2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2693300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of multitones for ultra-wideband software-defined radar

Abstract: From the literature review, it is apparent that there is a gap in quantifying the performances of multitone waveforms specifically for radar applications and experimental results not commonly found. This paper focuses on the radar performance analysis of multitones with P3 phase-codes in simulation and experimentally to determine the effect of hardware on radar performances. For this purpose, a softwaredefined radar (SDR) approach has been used, including a digital core with hardware in-the-loop controlled by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting direction to pursue for future research on the robustness of classification would be the comparison of FMCW radar with an OFDM radar when multiple radars operate in the same vicinity [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting direction to pursue for future research on the robustness of classification would be the comparison of FMCW radar with an OFDM radar when multiple radars operate in the same vicinity [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work will look at carrying out live experiments for validation with ultra‐wideband software defined radar [7, 9, 13, 31, 32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is commonly known as micro-Doppler signature or spectrogram representing the evolution of Doppler as a function of time at the cost of resolution because of the smaller window size. However, it allows capturing the motions of moving parts of a structure [15][16][17]. The overlap factor is 0.95, and the window size is 0.2s, giving a 200-point FFT zeropadded to 800.…”
Section: Data Collection and And Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%