1941
DOI: 10.1007/bf01585133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of adult patients on the Bellevue Intelligence Scales and the Revised Stanford-Binet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1943
1943
1951
1951

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the performance scale does not correlate as well with the Binet as does the verbal scale is to be expected in the light of the lesser proportion of such material in the Binet. This same trend, of the performance correlation being lower than the verbal, has been found with the adult Wechsler scale and the Binet [1,2]. In Table 2 are listed mean IQ scores, standard deviations, and ranges of scores of the total population and of the subgroups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That the performance scale does not correlate as well with the Binet as does the verbal scale is to be expected in the light of the lesser proportion of such material in the Binet. This same trend, of the performance correlation being lower than the verbal, has been found with the adult Wechsler scale and the Binet [1,2]. In Table 2 are listed mean IQ scores, standard deviations, and ranges of scores of the total population and of the subgroups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar studies are found in the literature, wherein the Stanford-Binet, Form L, 1937 Revision, is compared to the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale for Adults [1,3] and for Adolescents [2,6]. In some of these studies, provisional scales of equivalent scores were computed for Wechsler-Bellevue IQ's from a knowledge of Stanford-Binet IQ's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…1. Means of subtexts for the groups have been used as the only (4,5,8) or partial (11,20) basis for the comparison.of groups. This method is especially vulnerable and unreliable when the age and intelligence as well as cultural background factorsare poorly controlled or not controlled at all.…”
Section: Test Results and Characteristic Patterns Of Special Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies (2,4,7,8,9,10,35,46,56) comparing old and revised Stanford-Binet, short and long forms of Stanford-Binet, Stanford-Binet with Kuhlmann-Anderson, Kuhlmann Tests of Mental Development, Wechsler Bellevue and Kent EGY Tests have appeared. They agree that tests cannot be used interchangeably and that caution must be exercised in interpreting IQ's because of the dissimilar variability of different tests.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%