2019
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1579783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance validity measures in clinical patients with aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was despite there being a much higher proportion of severely injured cases, a lower proportion of outpatient assessments, and much greater cultural diversity in the current sample, which attests to the robustness of this finding within the brain injury rehabilitation setting. It is also in line with the base rates reported in many smaller studies of other clinical groups, including stroke (Bodner et al, 2019), Korsakoff's syndrome (Oudman et al, 2020), Huntington's disease (Sieck et al, 2012), mild cognitive impairment (Walter et al, 2014), and HIV (Paul et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This was despite there being a much higher proportion of severely injured cases, a lower proportion of outpatient assessments, and much greater cultural diversity in the current sample, which attests to the robustness of this finding within the brain injury rehabilitation setting. It is also in line with the base rates reported in many smaller studies of other clinical groups, including stroke (Bodner et al, 2019), Korsakoff's syndrome (Oudman et al, 2020), Huntington's disease (Sieck et al, 2012), mild cognitive impairment (Walter et al, 2014), and HIV (Paul et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…31 A study reporting validity test performance after stroke with initial aphasia found low failure rates on the (standard, pictorial) TOMM measures (7% (1/15 failing trial 2 and 0 failing the retention trial, but high failure rates on the Rey 15-item, RDS (<7) and reliable spatial span (60%, 73% and 40% respectively)). 32 One study described a single case of surgical removal of medial temporal lobe structures, and another described three cases of bilateral hippocampal atrophy after anoxic brain injury; none of these four individuals failed the WMT. 33 34 Oudman et al reported that 2 (10%) of 20 individuals with Korsakoff Amnesia failed the second trial of the TOMM.…”
Section: Acquired Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults with TBI versus simulators. As in prior research (Bodner, Merten, & Benke, 2019;Davis, 2018;Kanser et al, 2019), indexes that showed powerful ability to discriminate between healthy adults and TBI simulators in the typical analogue design were considerably less powerful in the ecologically valid challenge of discriminating the groups of greatest clinical interest: TBI simulators and those with verified TBI. Oculomotor behaviors partly under conscious control (i.e., purposefully looking at the background instead of at the response options) no longer reliably distinguished groups, suggesting that TBI simulators were able to adequately feign some aspects of inattention/cognitive inefficiency common to adults with verified TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%