2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(06)83173-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance validation of an innovative orthotic knee joint based on an optimal four bar linkage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We highlight these improvements with respect to passive KAFOs and free-swing orthoses: (1) The adaptation of the knee stiffness with the automatic system, provides sufficient support during stance phase; (2) The training method provides the patient with confidence to prepare for the beginning of the swing phase, while providing an effective free-swinging knee, (3) The actuator provides partial assistance to the knee extension at terminal swing. Each pathological case presents particular characteristics and thus, the mechanical fitting and control system tuning procedures require customisation of the actuator and control systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We highlight these improvements with respect to passive KAFOs and free-swing orthoses: (1) The adaptation of the knee stiffness with the automatic system, provides sufficient support during stance phase; (2) The training method provides the patient with confidence to prepare for the beginning of the swing phase, while providing an effective free-swinging knee, (3) The actuator provides partial assistance to the knee extension at terminal swing. Each pathological case presents particular characteristics and thus, the mechanical fitting and control system tuning procedures require customisation of the actuator and control systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motions of interest occur at normal (2.6 km/h) and low (2 km/h) gait speeds, and therefore, signals outside the band frequency related to gait kinematics (0.3-20 Hz), were rejected from the sensor outputs (-3 dB low pass filters). A precision angular position sensor (electric range of 340°) was fixed at one rotation axis of the four-bar mechanism of the knee joint, [2], used to track the knee joint angle. A resistive pressure sensor (5 mm in diameter active area, 0.30 mm in thickness) was used to determine the status of the kneelocking mechanism.…”
Section: Sensor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It locks the knee joint. Conversely, when torque is applied in a clockwise direction, the spring unfastens from the adjacent input and output shafts and allows the free knee motion [24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%